Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Saint Crispin vs Vass
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Saint Crispin vs Vass - Page 4

post #46 of 51
6/14/11 at 1:35pm
Those suede loafers look edible.
Reply
Reply
post #47 of 51
6/14/11 at 1:53pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mth View Post
It's hard to tell with the photographs, but the Vass lasts tend to be a fair bit bulkier overall when compared to the St. Crispins.

yep, i would have said the opposite looking at the pictures.
Reply
Reply
post #48 of 51
6/14/11 at 1:57pm
anyone off the top of their head name some other suede loafers similar in style ? (semi boxed toe, welted, no tassel, etc)

Reply
Reply
post #49 of 51
6/14/11 at 3:18pm
Many thanks for the side-by-side shots! Can't believe how close the St. Crispins Classic Last and the Vass F Last are.
Reply
Reply
post #50 of 51
6/14/11 at 11:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trompe le Monde View Post
anyone off the top of their head name some other suede loafers similar in style ? (semi boxed toe, welted, no tassel, etc)


It's a pretty popular style -- I think there are probably a number of manufacturers which make something similar. I've seen another forum member's Enzo Bonafe shoes which are quite close.
Reply
Reply
post #51 of 51
10/13/11 at 1:56am
263

matter of taste, but my prefer Vass- shapely and stylish shoe here, all class.

The St C bulbous and 'old man'- high-walled and inflated toe-box


263
Edited by Pliny - 10/13/11 at 2:07am
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Men's Clothing
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Saint Crispin vs Vass