Quote:
Originally Posted by
JapanAlex01 
1. I'm sure, U2 are old enough to now be considered cool by hipsters.
2. Xgau doesn't purposefully go out of his way to obfuscate. He is a well educated, smart writer. Read more. That is all.
3. You point about King Crimson is..? They are rated off that first album. One that is dumb (to not rate each album, separately) and two they suck"”go figure!
4. It's only his opinion people! People always bash him for the wrong reasons"”his education, writing ability, ears, etc.
5. Northern State are good. As are Soulja Boy and Lil Wayne (who are other moron targets).
1. No.
2. I've read a fair bit and I feel he does, for example the fact he seems to despise King Crimson yet seems to enjoy Pink Floyd and Yes just seems a bit ridiculous, like he's going against the grain for the sake of it.
3. I was referring to the fact you made a point of the fact that he rated each album by it's own merits instead of the rest of the bands work and reputation in response to me talking about In the Court, which I responded to by saying it's considered their best, it's really not that hard to understand what I was getting at.
4. It may be his opinion but the work of a critic is to also be objective in some way, to offer an insight as to how a certain album has influenced a genre and how important it was shaping the future of music to come. Christgau does not do this, instead simply dismissing an album completely and aggressively. To refer back to the King Crimson (again) the album is is very influential, although the genre debatably had other starting points, it is, along with one or two other albums, considered as the first album of the genre. In my mind this alone, even if the album sounded like complete shit, easily means it is worth far higher than a D+.
5. Oh shit you're a troll.
