Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Brooks Brothers MILANO PANTS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Brooks Brothers MILANO PANTS

post #1 of 26
4/13/11 at 12:55am
Thread Starter 
I think these may be the new incotex/mabitex - slim, durable, and cheap!

Can anyone post the measurements of whatever size Brooks Brothers Milano Pants? I'm especially interested in the true inseam measurement & hem width!
Reply
Reply

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Belvest at Pitti Uomo 83
Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread
Join the discussions now - Join Styleforum
post #2 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:09am
What size are you?
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:17am
Thread Starter 
33 usually. Not sure how true their inseam is...we'll need to get 33x30 or 33x32, as I want no break.
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:20am
Measurements from my 32x34: waist: 32'' inseam: 33" hem width: 8" rise: 10" fitpic (I should really be wearing a 31)
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:23am

...


Edited by yeeewk - 11/20/11 at 12:25am
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:26am
Unfortunately I have yet to wash them because I do not own a pair of shoes that go with them The material is quite strong though so I do not expect much shrinkage
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 26
4/13/11 at 1:48am
They're more consistant than Mabitex as far as quality and the fit is more "accessible," plus you can get them for cheaper than Mabis go on B&S.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeewk View Post
Anybody with these pants know how much they shrink in the wash? I may have gotten a size too large. They fit but could be a little slimmer.

Not much, besides they would just stretch back out after a couple wearings. If they're too large just exchange them, Brooks Bros is good about that.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 26
4/13/11 at 2:20am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeM View Post
Measurements from my 32x34:

waist: 32''
inseam: 33"
hem width: 8"
rise: 10"

fitpic (I should really be wearing a 31)
So it looks like the waist runs small as a size 32 should normally have a 33" waist...and also the inseam seems to run 1" shorter than the advertised?
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 26
4/13/11 at 10:11am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotdang View Post
So it looks like the waist runs small as a size 32 should normally have a 33" waist...and also the inseam seems to run 1" shorter than the advertised?

I wear 32x34, and mine fit similar to all my other 32x34 pants.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 26
4/13/11 at 5:28pm
Thread Starter 
anyone else with any input?
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 26
4/13/11 at 5:40pm
I have a few pairs of the chinos. I am a 34x34 in Banana Republic, and I got a 35x34 in these. It was the right move. I wish they were a little more tapered, but for $23 for the lightweight and $34 for the regular on clearance, they're just fine.
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 26
4/13/11 at 5:50pm
They fit true to size, rise is on the low side but not horribly so, fabric is nice, pockets tend to flare out a bit when seated.
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 26
4/13/11 at 6:03pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseJB View Post
They fit true to size, rise is on the low side but not horribly so, fabric is nice, pockets tend to flare out a bit when seated.

This is exactly correct. My only dislike is the flare at the hip from the pockets but that is minor. The price is beyond great and BB changes the fabric weight across seasons.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 26
4/13/11 at 6:44pm
Do any of their current lineup of dress pants have this nice, modern cut to them?
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 26
4/13/11 at 6:44pm

....


Edited by yeeewk - 11/20/11 at 12:24am
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Belvest at Pitti Uomo 83
Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread
Join the discussions now - Join Styleforum
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Brooks Brothers MILANO PANTS