One thing to keep in mind is that within the world of artists and galleries, there is a very small subset of either that will sell a product that appreciates in cultural or economic currency as "legitimate" artwork, rather than decorative artwork/antique. This is related to how those artists and galleries market themselves, to whom, and whether that audience is receptive to them. A $500 piece bought from an undergraduate student that does not go on to get an MA or pursue their career in other ways will probably not ever be worth more than $500. Art bought from galleries or auctions with a decorative focus also have mostly embalmed value. On the other hand, that "legitimate" work has to appreciate to an often absurd amount before it can command any attention in the secondary market. I own a few pieces that I bought for $50 (my first purchase was at 16, with interest from my bar mitzvah money; the artist has amazingly achieved a small amount of fame) - $500 that now sell at galleries for much more, but that does not mean that I can find a buyer for them. The Vogels were buying from the right galleries at the right time. There was a major factor of luck mixed in with their passion, which is what makes their decision to donate, rather than sell their collection so interesting and perhaps admirable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
StephenHero 
I didn't see the movie, but I've seen my fair share of "affordable art" in people's homes on Apartment Therapy, or in Dwell & other living magazines. I think bad artists usually have a common characteristic in that they really treat their subjects as sacredly profound. They really fetishize beauty and tragedy in the same way emo chicks in high school do. The best affordable art pieces I've seen are humble, mundane, and unapologetically mediocre.
IIRC, when my house was on Apartment Therapy you liked the big piece in my living room

. Bolded is not a bad point.