• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Math Problem taking the Internet by storm

cronicmole

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
442
Reaction score
35
48÷2(9+3) = 2 or 288
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/48÷293
http://niketalk.yuku.com/topic/294672/48-2-9-3?page=1
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=488334
the-game-philosoraptor.png
 

JohnnyLaw

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
136
It can be confusing because the notation is bad. What's your point?
 

iand

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
This is not a math problem. This a sequence of signs that can be interpreted in two ways depending on convention agreed upon.
 

ter1413

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
22,101
Reaction score
6,033
2..
 

godofcoffee

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
269
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by iand
This is not a math problem. This a sequence of signs that can be interpreted in two ways depending on convention agreed upon.

Interesting perspective. Your argument holds true for any field that can be linguistically expressed, though - there is common agreement on the order of operations, just like there is common agreement on what a lumen is or what constitutes benzene. Disagreement implies ignorance of the field, in this case math.
 

binge

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
5,102
Reaction score
155
Agreed conventions on not just operator precedence, but also associativity.
 

Archivist

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
688
Reaction score
34
******* Magnets, How Do They Work?

IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. I AGREE

TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.
 

Garbage Mouth

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
177
Reaction score
3
I always thought using PEMDAS was the only way to solve problems like these. If you use it on this, you end up with 2 as your answer. Or is it something else...?
 

RedScarf7

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
482
Reaction score
0
Notation is sloppy, but as given the answer is 288. PEMDAS says the brackets would be resolved first, than multiplication and division would be resolved from left to right.

48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

Answer would be 2 if it was written 48÷(2(9+3)). Could also argue that the answer would be 2 if it was given as 48/2(9+3) as this suggests that 2(9+3) is the denominator.
 

Dakota rube

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
13,306
Reaction score
237
Granted, I have not taken a math class since before the invention of the electronic calculator, but I'd solve the problem to 2.
 

Harold falcon

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
32,028
Reaction score
11,364
Originally Posted by RedScarf7
Notation is sloppy, but as given the answer is 288. PEMDAS says the brackets would be resolved first, than multiplication and division would be resolved from left to right.

48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

Answer would be 2 if it was written 48÷(2(9+3)). Could also argue that the answer would be 2 if it was given as 48/2(9+3) as this suggests that 2(9+3) is the denominator.


I back this.
 

MrG

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
12,401
Reaction score
5,654
Originally Posted by RedScarf7
Notation is sloppy, but as given the answer is 288. PEMDAS says the brackets would be resolved first, than multiplication and division would be resolved from left to right.

48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
24(12)
288

Answer would be 2 if it was written 48÷(2(9+3)). Could also argue that the answer would be 2 if it was given as 48/2(9+3) as this suggests that 2(9+3) is the denominator.


This is how I solved it, and I agree with your comments on notation.
 

Pantisocrat

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
1,762
Reaction score
7
answer is 2
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 23 10.2%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 16.0%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,415
Messages
10,589,041
Members
224,225
Latest member
addison07
Top