or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Gaziano & Girling Appreciation & Shoe Appreciation Thread (including reviews, purchases, pictures, etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gaziano & Girling Appreciation & Shoe Appreciation Thread (including reviews, purchases, pictures, etc...) - Page 108

post #1606 of 21775
^+1 I don't remember my Hayes looking that wide
post #1607 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by luk-cha View Post

what you need is another delivery address

I'll pm you mine.
post #1608 of 21775
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00

General question - I'm a noob so this'll probably sound dumb - but if I can only afford one pair of G&G, is it a waste to have them made-up in suede? I wear jeans more often than not, and I'm in Texas where the weather won't destroy suede.

As opposed to what? I mean, what suede shoes would you buy instead?

Sorry - I simply meant if I'm limited to one pair of G&G should I go the calf or pigskin route as opposed to suede. I'd originally wanted shell, but Tony explained how they have a hard time finding shell which meets their high standards. I've never paid $1200 for a pair of shoes, so I was just seeking advice from those of you who have experience with these kinds of purchases - wondering if down the line I'd regret going with suede.
post #1609 of 21775
^ Only you can answer that, my friend. For what it's worth, I have a pr of suede on order - but I have some leather and shell also. Maybe you could ease into it with some suede in the $5-700 range?
post #1610 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00 View Post

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00
General question - I'm a noob so this'll probably sound dumb - but if I can only afford one pair of G&G, is it a waste to have them made-up in suede? I wear jeans more often than not, and I'm in Texas where the weather won't destroy suede.
As opposed to what? I mean, what suede shoes would you buy instead?
Sorry - I simply meant if I'm limited to one pair of G&G should I go the calf or pigskin route as opposed to suede. I'd originally wanted shell, but Tony explained how they have a hard time finding shell which meets their high standards. I've never paid $1200 for a pair of shoes, so I was just seeking advice from those of you who have experience with these kinds of purchases - wondering if down the line I'd regret going with suede.

I personally like the looks of suede...but you need to be aware that depending on how it is produced it can be a very delicate and weak leather.

And anytime the grain surface is stripped off or turned to the inside, the result will always be nearly as water absorbent as a sponge. And dirt, too, will tend to not only accumulate more readily on suede but be harder to remove.
post #1611 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00 View Post

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00
General question - I'm a noob so this'll probably sound dumb - but if I can only afford one pair of G&G, is it a waste to have them made-up in suede? I wear jeans more often than not, and I'm in Texas where the weather won't destroy suede.
As opposed to what? I mean, what suede shoes would you buy instead?
Sorry - I simply meant if I'm limited to one pair of G&G should I go the calf or pigskin route as opposed to suede. I'd originally wanted shell, but Tony explained how they have a hard time finding shell which meets their high standards. I've never paid $1200 for a pair of shoes, so I was just seeking advice from those of you who have experience with these kinds of purchases - wondering if down the line I'd regret going with suede.

I'd personally go with a discreet calf in that case. It’s the most versatile choice in my opinion. Suede and pigskin are more casual, while you can wear Black Calf or Vintage Oak Calf for most occassions.
post #1612 of 21775
i love suede, but in my experience they are best as an occasional shoe. if youre looking for a workhorse shoe you might want a less delicate leather.
post #1613 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhcam8 View Post

^ Only you can answer that, my friend.

+1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhcam8 View Post

Maybe you could ease into it with some suede in the $5-700 range?

i guess our friend is after the distinctive design of g&g, which is rather unique on the market. probably carmina could offer an alternative.

same, when people cannot understand a bespoke pair in black. imo, why compromising in fit and comfort?
post #1614 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

i love suede, but in my experience they are best as an occasional shoe. if youre looking for a workhorse shoe you might want a less delicate leather.

suede is one of the least delicate.
post #1615 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritzl View Post

suede is one of the least delicate.

shog[1].gif i guess the suede shoes ive had in the past were just crappy then. or i didnt know how to care for them. either way tbh i havent had a pair in a while cuz the ones i had didnt hold up. well,

231

i guess its time for me to get back into suede from a respectable maker. i already have a good suede maintenance kit, thanks spoo! wink.gif
post #1616 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritzl View Post

suede is one of the least delicate.

+1 - Steven at Leffot also has this opinion.
post #1617 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritzl View Post

suede is one of the least delicate.

Au contraire...you're over your head and your paygrade here. Much of the suede on the market is goat skin. Goat is not high on the list of leathers with good tensile strength. You can often rip it with very little effort and bare hands. And goat (and 'kid' --young goat) are notorious for 'peeling'...when the grain surface is struck the grain itself will peel back.

Another large portion of the the "suede" being used is 'splits'--leather where the top grain has been split off and used in better quality shoes, thus removing as much as 50% or more of the intrinsic tensile strength.

All that said, I did say it "can be" delicate. Some suede is actually a full grain calf that is simply turned inside out. While this retains most or all of the tensile strength of that particular leather, it doesn't eliminate the inherent problems of exposing the flesh side to rain and grit. All of which is compounded by the fact that almost any conditioner that one might apply to a grain-side calf will ruin the look of the "suede."

On the other hand, it's all relative, isn't it? I mean even the worst suede is probably stronger than paper.
post #1618 of 21775
Wow - what an unbelievable wealth of knowledge. Can't tell you how much I appreciate everyone's input. Thanks for the help. I think I've decided on the Windsor in Vintage Chestnut. If Tony can find a last, that is. I have huge feet (UK12.5), and he seemed uncertain about if they had an existing last that would work. Cross my fingers, I guess. Thanks again guys.
post #1619 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsharp00 View Post

Wow - what an unbelievable wealth of knowledge. Can't tell you how much I appreciate everyone's input. Thanks for the help. I think I've decided on the Windsor in Vintage Chestnut. If Tony can find a last, that is. I have huge feet (UK12.5), and he seemed uncertain about if they had an existing last that would work. Cross my fingers, I guess. Thanks again guys.

I've had an order in for about four months for a pair in 12.5G, so I sure hope they have something that will work.
post #1620 of 21775
Quote:
Originally Posted by fritzl View Post

suede is one of the least delicate.

this is true. I've handled many 60+ pairs of shoes where the regular calf was dried and cracking, while the suede was still going strong.

DWF had a good point about suede & dirt, though.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Gaziano & Girling Appreciation & Shoe Appreciation Thread (including reviews, purchases, pictures, etc...)