Certainly wasn't trying to evoke anything - once again DWGII has taken what was said out of context and I was replying to dddrees who thought I was criticising GYW, which I was not.
For my own part I apologise to DWGII for mentiontioning him, that was a lack of thought on my part, and as we have quite a difference in opinions on certain things, it was wrong of me single him out without expecting him to respond.
Whilst I am very interested in the things DWGII says and the knowledge he brings to this forum for free, I am getting tired with the whole GYW thing.
As I have stated, whether they be hand or GYW shoes, the appearance of the shoe is important.
For the record and for clarrty's sake.
1 - I have nothing bad to say about GYW shoes, I have worn them all my life without a problem
2 - I do not have any knowledge base to enable me to have any factual based comments on the advantage of one over the other.
3 - As said previously by another member in this thread, 90% of the shoes that give me pleasure when I look at them on the interweb, are stamped with the name Gaziano and Girling.
I likewise agree that I would like to get back to discussing G&G - and if DWGII feels the need to discuss things further I am quite happy to do so if he wishes to PM me rather than expounding his vast wealth of knowledge in the incorrect thread - please and thank you
Edited by Berners15 - 7/1/15 at 5:18am