I don't quite understand how you could think it's not a journalistic duty to publish brand new alleged Trump victims testimonies from 20,30 years ago yet never stop harping about the Clinton victims testimonies from 20, 30 years ago that have been discussed to death since the other Clinton presidency
It's almost like you don't have the bias or agenda that you accuse everybody else of having
The context is important too. This is immediately on the heels of Trump bragging about sexual assault on video. Allegations about sexual assault just might carry more credibility in that context.