or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 5063  

post #75931 of 78719

awsm  ^^  Navy doesn't pic well, but that 3rd one gets it.  Nice:slayer: 

post #75932 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by An Acute Style View Post

Happy Easter.

Day 8: Boston, MA JFK Memorial Library, Newbury St, Dinner at Grotto Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
 






 

 

 

You were in the hood! I went to work for a few hours just a few minutes walk from Grotto. I went there for restaurant week and quite liked the food!

Get anything on newbury? Trident is one of my favorite coffee shops and is right at the start of the street near hynes.

How was the Boston part of your trip? Are you sticking around for the marathon tomorrow?

post #75933 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliny View Post
Dressing like a pirate is Classic Style?  :confused:  u smokin crack?
 

 

Er, no. I don't remember typing the word "pirate". That would be your word, Pliny.

 

Dressing like a rock star could conceivably be "classic style" though. After all, that style of menswear has been around for over sixty years now. The Beatles and the Stones were very sharply coutured during the early 60s. Carnaby Street style in the mid to late 60s borrowed heavily from classic influences across several eras.

 

Whether one accepts this possibility would depend on one's inherent degree of conservatism. Rock star style (and of course I am not referring to the excesses of hippydom/psychedelia/glam here) involves mixing influences, which militates against stylistic cohesion, but does open up new aesthetic doors. This has always gone on - think of 19th-century dandyism, or gangster style from the 20s, which involved a similar mix-up and exaggeration of styles, designed to catch the eye and make an extroverted statement.

 

My guess is that Shoe Artist is well aware of the stylistic influences he is mixing together. I don't think his fits are happening by accident. I'll concede though, that it's risky and difficult to carry off.

post #75934 of 78719

@Cox--  Not saying it's not a valid style, and not making a value judgement.  But that look can't be found in AA, or Esquire, or Flusser or Boyer etc.  and it's certainly not within the norms, to date, of this thread.  There is a 'Peacock' Thread./  It'd fit rite in there.

post #75935 of 78719

I think butler's jeans fit was sadly a miss for me.

post #75936 of 78719

post #75937 of 78719

Pliny, were you referring to Shoe Artist's first two fits? 

 

I'm curious to know what you make of his most recent one, with the three-piece suit.

post #75938 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coxsackie View Post
 

Pliny, were you referring to Shoe Artist's first two fits? 

 

I'm curious to know what you make of his most recent one, with the three-piece suit.

 

PM'd u

post #75939 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by An Acute Style View Post

Happy Easter.

Day 8: Boston, MA JFK Memorial Library, Newbury St, Dinner at Grotto ]

I'm always 'mirin your fits. Deets on the pants?
post #75940 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coxsackie View Post
  Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

Er, no. I don't remember typing the word "pirate". That would be your word, Pliny.

 

Dressing like a rock star could conceivably be "classic style" though. After all, that style of menswear has been around for over sixty years now. The Beatles and the Stones were very sharply coutured during the early 60s. Carnaby Street style in the mid to late 60s borrowed heavily from classic influences across several eras.

 

Whether one accepts this possibility would depend on one's inherent degree of conservatism. Rock star style (and of course I am not referring to the excesses of hippydom/psychedelia/glam here) involves mixing influences, which militates against stylistic cohesion, but does open up new aesthetic doors. This has always gone on - think of 19th-century dandyism, or gangster style from the 20s, which involved a similar mix-up and exaggeration of styles, designed to catch the eye and make an extroverted statement.

 

 

C-   there's good rock star MC

 

.. then there's just rock star

 

post #75941 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoe artist View Post
 

Hello Gentlemen

Thanks for all your encouragements it's take me time to find my own style.

For today Easter sunday in family I'm wearing something more classical.

 

 

I suddenly realised who you remind me of, Shoe artist: :)

 

 

(For the non-cyclists: this is Bradley Wiggins, erstwhile winner of the Tour de France)

post #75942 of 78719
And Bradley Wiggins reminds me of Paul Weller, the Modfather

post #75943 of 78719

Certainly no coincidence :D

 

post #75944 of 78719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoe artist View Post

Hello Gentlemen
Thanks for all your encouragements it's take me time to find my own style.
For today Easter sunday in family I'm wearing something more classical.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


I really like this, with the exception of that monkey fist of a tie knot.
post #75945 of 78719

EliodA, now that you've changed your avatar I realise where your username comes from.

 

Poor old Elio. Great driver in his day. And those really were the days.

 

Speaking of which, OT I know (and apologise in advance), but did anyone see "Rush"? What a great movie.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III