or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 5047  

post #75691 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by EFV View Post

Where I live they do, anything looser would be considered baggy.

Assuming that you're talking about jeans, I'd say that's the case for most of Europe.
post #75692 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by EFV View Post

Where I live they do, anything looser would be considered baggy.

Doesn't make it right.
post #75693 of 78717
I can wear a beach-y sweater in Ohio on 60°F days, right?

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


post #75694 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossrockss View Post

I can wear a beach-y sweater in Ohio on 60°F days, right?
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


That would look much better with beach-y trousers. These are much too dark and formal for the light sweater.
post #75695 of 78717
Not sold on that fit, Moss. I can't tell what kind of pants those are. If they are chinos that's fine, but the sweater is way too casual if they are anything dressier. Also, that sweater is way to casual for the ocbd under it. I would wear that sweater without a collared shirt under it. Also, I think charcoal pants, or jeans would look better with the sweater.
post #75696 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeyface View Post

That would look much better with beach-y trousers. These are much too dark and formal for the light sweater.

That's what I was afraid of!
post #75697 of 78717

I have noticed a number of fits getting a lot of praise when I thought the jackets were laughably short, but then I remember that I'm old.

Regardless of the temperature, I'm retiring the winter wardrobe completely this weekend (thought that happened last weekend, though). One just gets too bored wearing the same stuff over and over.

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

 

 

 

post #75698 of 78717
I like it Sea, I just think it would look better if it was an OCBD bengal striped shirt.
post #75699 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleav View Post

Somewhat cooler today so took a last chance to hook up my second @Henry Carter with this DB

  Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
AppleMark

 

 

awsm chalkstripe

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by jungleroller View Post


Since we're on the subject of length. I'm still trying to understand this. I know general rules as far as coat length (cover the ass/go to the knuckles) but then when I see the above and many other fits barely covering the ass I second guess those rules. It seems SC's are being cut much shorter nowadays and their fits still getting high praise. Is there some exception to this that I'm missing? I'm not saying I dislike the above look but it just goes against what I know. Edit, I guess it's hard to tell in the above pic.

 

casual fit like Robs89's a shorter jacket is a must IMO.  tight pants sticking out of a longer jacket's :plain:

post #75700 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickBOOTH View Post

Length is a weird thing. Commenters have their own ways of assessing it based on things like where the hem is in relation to the wearer's hands and such, but that is inaccurate due to some people have shorter or longer arms and hands. Also people forget that some people have longer or shorter torsos, the same for people's legs. To really assess length you have to look at the whole picture, the entire height of the person and even how fitted the garment is to assess it.

 

+1000

 

Flusser’s worth quoting on the length issue, because what he has to say is pretty much what a good tailor would say:

 

“The principal criterion governing a jacket’s length is that it be long enough to cover the curvature of the buttocks while giving the leg as long a line as possible […] Two methods for determining the correct method originated with America’s development of ready-made men’s clothing, which needed general guidelines upon which to establish its standards of fit.  The first employs the arm as a guide; when your hand is dropped at you side, the bottom of the jacket is supposed to line up with the [knuckle of the] outstretched thumb.  Though generally reliable, this formula has one drawback:  arm length varies from person to person.  The second approach measures the distance from the jacket’s back collar (the point at which it joins the coat’s body) to the floor, which is then divided in half.  This is the procedure taught in most tailoring schools.  Either of these two approaches can be influenced by dimensions unique to the wearer; a top tailor will use neither, trusting his practiced eye to take in the whole picture before deciding on the jacket’s ideal length.”  — Dressing the Man, pp. 40-41.

 

Notice, please:  (1) the first criterion is that the buttocks be covered; (2) the most frequently cited criterion, the thumb knuckle, is actually the least reliable and has its origins not in tailoring but in marketing; (3) the half-way-to-the-floor criterion is one taught to tailors (but only as a first approximation subject to adjustments to accommodate the individual).

 

Since most photos on SF are from the front, it’s not always possible to know with certainty if a jacket is properly covering the buttocks.  A reasonable substitute is to see if it covers the crotch:  does it extend to the point in the vertical dimension where the two trouser inseams meet.

 

The most important point, however, is the one I put in bold type (the same can be said for buttoning points, but that’s a different discussion).  One dresses an individual, not an ideal.

 

Cheers,

 

Ac

post #75701 of 78717
Thanks @Pliny much appreciated

@SeaJen Like that combo, like the tie especially, colour works for me. Similar shades there too it's picking up nod[1].gif
post #75702 of 78717
Aló!

Having some meetings when everybody else is on vacation.

post #75703 of 78717

After my favorite suit from yesterday (thanks for the thumbs), here my second favorite suit from Corneliani.

 

 

See details (Click to show)

 

 

 

 

post #75704 of 78717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudals View Post
 

I don't like the tie. Your jacket sleeves are uneven and a tad bit long and the length of the jacket is short. :nest:

The tie, though the entire method of judging a tie could be debatable, is subjective. Clag wears lighter ties a lot. It's his thing. It looks good.

 

The jacket sleeves thing, it's not a fit pic. Could be the way he's standing. I never judge that unless someone is asking me to.

 

As far as the length of the jacket, I WOULD be inclined to agree but I know Clag likes his stuff a certain way, like button stance a bit high, and etc. And as Booth said, length is a funny thing. 

Overall, I'd say he looks great. I'd call him a well dressed son of a bitch any day.

post #75705 of 78717

For Butler's trainwreck challenge:

 

Ddrs028.jpg?1

 

Yeah, jeans...

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
d1gjMeU.jpg

 

PS. switching right to the other end of the formality spectrum, and indulging in a little light shilling, if any 36R/36S wants a great tux from Ede & Ravenscroft, I've just listed one for sale in B&S.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III