or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 4528  

post #67906 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by arglist View Post
 

 

Actually the shortness bothers me more than the shoulder issue (the dimples appear and disappear as I move). The lenght is unchanged (it's a short size), so the button position should be correct. But I agree it looks off.

 

Thanks for commenting on the positives. Sadly, while doing the pics I realized the pants are rather terrible, too much fabric around the seat and on the inside of the tighs.

 

I like my tie, though. :)


Yes, I see the pants issue too now. Keep positive!

post #67907 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Septimus View Post

Zizek is super-fun, but he is far from a style icon. I've seen him lecture in a sweatshirt.


I'm no Zizek, but when I was just starting out (as a lecturer), I taught in white t-shirts:uhoh:.

 

Now, I wear a coat/tie...but still remain in the minority on my campus (and even more of a minority for wearing a PS).

 

There's another discussion for "formality/uniform" and context where it is required. I think the classroom is one of those more formal contexts, but people these days like it casual on campus. Certainly, a public scholarly lecture demands a coat and tie. Sweats, no.

post #67908 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claghorn View Post


Aspiring, and I'd be surprised if he was wearing pants.


Just to clarify (you're British?), is that "pants" in the English or American sense (or both!).

post #67909 of 78723

I've been sick for over a week with all the weather we're having, but back to work today.

 

Not entirely sure if the Jacket/Pants patterns mesh well...

Jacket/Pants (Click to show)

 

 

 

 

and @upr_crust Great look!  I really like those cufflinks!  


Edited by jungleroller - 1/8/14 at 7:19am
post #67910 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarbutch View Post

You know that's a ridiculous statement, right?

Of course he does. smile.gif

---

Timo, pingson, clapey, great stuff.

Pingson, deets on tie and shoes?
post #67911 of 78723

@clapeyron that is the next fabric I would order from Luxire! Great combo!

 

@Pliny great combo!

 

@Pingson as usual, very nice!

 

@Claghorn dat jacket! :slayer:

post #67912 of 78723
UC - double scarfer! Where's the Astrakhan from? confused.gif Wearing mine today....cold[1].gif
post #67913 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by romafan View Post

UC - double scarfer! Where's the Astrakhan from? confused.gif Wearing mine today....cold[1].gif

It's still cold enough to need a scarf to wrap around one's face, and the Astrakhan is from Seifter Associates, via (he says shamefacedly) Century 21, several years ago. I wish that I had kopped the brown one as well - alas . . .
post #67914 of 78723

New grenadine from Exquisit trimmings in burnt orange and a new pocket square from Drake´s

 

 

See details (Click to show)

 

 

 

 

post #67915 of 78723





Grey, brown, blue, and white.
post #67916 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonCologne View Post

New grenadine from Exquisit trimmings in burnt orange and a new pocket square from Drake´s Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


Brilliant!
post #67917 of 78723
Quote:
Originally Posted by arglist View Post
 

 

OK, here's the same jacket as yesterday, no sweater and with mimo-friendly legwear. What do you guys think?

 

 

Just to be clear on the denim thing, I don't think it is totally without use:  seriously, were I riding a classic motorcycle and accompanying my jeans with a black biker jacket and some oiled (deliberately and otherwise) boots, or driving longhorns across West Texas, or smashing rocks in some kind of penal colony, there could be nothing more appropriate.  But my issue is this: in every other conceivable instance, there is a better choice.  Yes, you could wear jeans with a sports jacket - though not as scruffy as the item you dragged out yesterday - and it would look OK.  But coloured twills, cords, grey flannels or any number of other things, would still look sharper.  It's a bit like the whole collar-points-under-the-lapels thing: nobody in the real world is going to point a finger and say "hey, look at that dickhead with his insufficiently spread collar!" (well, unless you are unfortunate enough to walk past an incognito SF meet of especially judgemental and acerbic members, to which you were not invited).  And nobody is going to say "hey, that guy's wearing jeans with his sports jacket!" either, probably, as most will either consider you dressed up for wearing a jacket at all that isn't made of nylon with a baseball logo on the back, or achingly cool for your "street style".  

 

But this is, after all, the "Classic Menswear" section, and I think we should aspire to be the best-dressed we can possibly be.  In some ways, how we dress when we are relaxed says more about our standards than how we dress when we're making an effort:  everyone usually looks decent in black tie.  But catch a guy in the supermarket, and the one in a well-fitting lambswool sweater, wide wale cords and country brogues is just as relaxed and comfortable as the other guy in jogging pants and a sweatshirt.  But when the radio announces the zombie apocalypse or similar, for some reason everyone turns towards Mr country casual as he says "...right, this is what we need to do...."  Jeans are  the lowest common denominator - the shorthand of "casual" for pretty much everyone.  But as such they are so generic that they neither say "relaxed" nor even "rebellious" as James Dean might have thought.  They say lazy and unimaginative.  And also, I think, cautious.  An inverted kind of conservatism: "everyone gets jeans, right?".  Pah.  Better to be pointed at by intrigued children for wearing burnt orange chinos, than have someone's dad say "ha...yeah...501s...me too...worn nothing else since 1972...".  Iggy Pop gets a pass.  Nobody else.

 

Anyway, I digress: your jacket still doesn't fit.  It's too tight across the belly and chest, making the quarters pop up and stand straight out in front of you like belly antennae, and pulling your shoulders down.  There's no immediate solution to that, I fear.  Which is a pity as the jacket is nice.  You look kind of uncomfortable as a result of trying to stand in the most jacket accommodating way, so it's hard to say how your (perfectly decent) trousers fit.  And I really do like your shoes.

post #67918 of 78723

Crusty, I do like you with a dickie.  That's a nice mix of conservative-you and country-you. Professorial-you, perhaps?  

 

Don, that tie and PS are a perfect combination and really well matched with the suit.  Nice pick-up; I'm waiting for a delivery from ET myself...

 

CP, you are off the leash these days, my friend!  Some part of me says that shouldn't work, but it does.  You look quite the dandy, in every positive way possible.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TweedyProf View Post


Just to clarify (you're British?), is that "pants" in the English or American sense (or both!).

 

He is American in pants terminology, Texan in bars, Latino in buttocks and English in Korean dental standards.

post #67919 of 78723

post #67920 of 78723
o/o, really been liking your fits lately.

---

new shoes new tie!







SC - Isaia for SFA
Shirt - Kamakura
Tie - Drakes for LuxeSwap
PS - Brooks Brothers
Pants - Brooks Brothers
Socks - Bresciani (No Vis)
Shoes - G&G Via Luxeswap
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
This thread is locked  
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III