New Posts All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 423

Subscribe Search This Thread

Start a New Thread

post #6331 of 51611

6/29/11 at 8:15am

fritzl

Posts: 12,299
Joined: 4/2006
Location: Gmunden, Salzkammergut, Austria
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinsp8

Pants too long.

to be fair. yours are longer...

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Random fashion thoughts - aka community ramblings

If you need help with a wedding tux, interview suit, etc... check out Styleforum 101

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread

post #6332 of 51611

6/29/11 at 8:18am

SpooPoker
Internet Bigtimer and Affiliate Vendor

Posts: 23,277
Joined: 10/2009
Select All Posts By This User

What in the pancaked rabbit head happened in here?

post #6333 of 51611

6/29/11 at 8:51am

upr_crust

Posts: 1,643
Joined: 5/2007
Location: NYC, NY
Select All Posts By This User

post #6334 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:04am

Posts: 570
Joined: 4/2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by fritzl

definitely nothing wrong with them.

Ouch(?)

post #6335 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:04am

niidawg3

Posts: 3,471
Joined: 5/2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by upr_crust

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

that is one of, if not your best fitting suit - by far. fuller cut suits can still fit right, and this does.

nice.

post #6336 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:11am

fritzl

Posts: 12,299
Joined: 4/2006
Location: Gmunden, Salzkammergut, Austria
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by EFV

Ouch(?)

why.

i'm so to say an ambassador for black shoes. also, it's not a flaw to have black laces in a burgundy shoe. today, it's hard to find good laces in the right tone. btw, i like them a lot.

post #6337 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:13am

Posts: 570
Joined: 4/2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by tshaw

Oh, Vox - wished you had left the Donne quote from what I read mid-night - it was excellent!! and a learning tool for some of the youngsters here.

Humiliation is the beginning of sanctification. (?)

post #6338 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:15am

Posts: 570
Joined: 4/2011
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by fritzl

why.

i'm so to say an ambassador for black shoes. also, it's not a flaw to have black laces in a burgundy shoe. today, it's hard to find good laces in the right tone. btw, i like them a lot.

Oh, I just presumed it was a venomous way to say that the shoes were fine but everything else sucked. You never know around here.

Edit: Thank you, I also love black shoes, but as I said, am not totally confident when wearing them with non formal outfits.

post #6339 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:32am

fritzl

Posts: 12,299
Joined: 4/2006
Location: Gmunden, Salzkammergut, Austria
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by EFV

Edit: Thank you, I also love black shoes, but as I said, am not totally confident when wearing them with non formal outfits.

i got that.

keep on rockin'

post #6340 of 51611

6/29/11 at 9:51am

Mr.P

Posts: 160
Joined: 9/2009
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by acecow

I have seen it.

And I agree.

I realised very quickly that it's neither possible nor proper to try and educate grown men on social etiquette via teh internets.

post #6341 of 51611

6/29/11 at 10:12am

Holdfast

Posts: 9,129
Joined: 3/2006
Location: Oxford, England
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinsp8

I call it 'Cobalt-60 blue'... it will not cause radioactivity if you do not get closer than 6 inches to your monitor.

Does that make my bright blue trousers from yesterday merely Co-30 then...?

Quote:

Originally Posted by koning

I didn't mean to be harsh, and i dont feel any aversion towards Holdfast, let's terminate this

. Keep the posting of outfits up. Cheers.

Just for the record, I have no personal issue with koning either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpooPoker

What in the pancaked rabbit head happened in here?

Looked at by an observer, it was actually an almost archetypal example of what happens when you create a different visual perception of a shared object in two people's reality, in this case the object being the photo. I perceived something in the photo that the other party did not; a pattern recognition effect leading to an altered concept of the object in my mind, compared to what the other party's concept of the object in question was. The differing perceptual set caused by this optical illusion led to a response (mine) that could not be received in the way I intended it by the other party. From that point out, each set of comments follows a predictable path, culminating in strong(ish) words and cross-purposes. Scaled-up, and used more precisely, it's actually the same process (different perceptual origin points leading to diverging conceptual understandings) that drives humour and people's fascination with optical illusions and paradoxes. It's also what will doom the human race to perpetual conflict due to misunderstanding as we do not perceive the world algorithmically but heuristically, and without perfect theory of mind. On a more individual level, as well as illusions, it's also what in an extreme and unwell case can give rise to a primary delusion from a delusional perception, with the possibility of secondary delusions and a full-blown delusional system arising thereof. However, it's also what gives us hope even in dire adversity, so I would not trade this human trait in for a purely deductive worldview. Anyway, as koning quite rightly says today, let's get back to the clothes:

post #6342 of 51611

6/29/11 at 10:17am

upr_crust

Posts: 1,643
Joined: 5/2007
Location: NYC, NY
Select All Posts By This User

post #6343 of 51611

6/29/11 at 10:22am

SpooPoker
Internet Bigtimer and Affiliate Vendor

Posts: 23,277
Joined: 10/2009
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holdfast

Looked at by an observer, it was actually an almost archetypal example of what happens when you create a different visual perception of a shared object in two people's reality, in this case the object being the photo. I perceived something in the photo that the other party did not; a pattern recognition effect leading to an altered concept of the object in my mind, compared to what the other party's concept of the object in question was. The differing perceptual set led to a response (mine) that could not be received in the way I intended it by the other party. From that point out, each set of comments follows a predictable path, culminating in strong(ish) words and cross-purposes.

Scaled-up, and used more precisely, it's actually the same process (different perceptual origin points leading to diverging conceptual understandings) that drives humour and people's fascination with optical illusions and paradoxes. It's also what will doom the human race to perpetual conflict due to misunderstanding as we do not perceive the world algorithmically but heuristically, and without perfect theory of mind. On a more individual level, as well as illusions, it's also what can give rise to a primary delusion from a delusional perception. However, it's also what gives us hope even in dire adversity, so I would not trade this human trait in for a purely deductive worldview.

Anyway, as koning quite rightly says today, let's get back to the clothes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by voxsartoria

Finally! Someone is throwing down with Holdfast and his snarky, wisecracking, innuendo layered within tangents buried underneath elliptical references.

Let the wagering begin.

- B