Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 2750

post #41236 of 51726
12/10/12 at 6:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gdot View Post

There's an incantation for that.
Have you any eye of toad?

Fairly certain I have some laying around here somewhere. I think I'm out of newt's tail though, so he's going to have to find that himself.
Reply
Reply

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Follow Styleforum on Facebook for the latest news and our random ramblings
Derek Rose at Pitti Uomo 83
What Are you Wearing Today, "Streetwear" edition, pictures and discussion
post #41237 of 51726
12/10/12 at 7:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfluous View Post

Did you intentionally have your pocket square follow the curve of your pocket? If yes (assuming your pocket bottom doesn't follow the curve), did you do anything special?

That was the luck of the stuff this morning.
Reply
Reply
post #41238 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:01pm
Did not get a fit pic in today because of the weather in NYC, however I can personally test that crusty was in excellent taste.
Reply
Reply
post #41239 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie22 View Post

To be honest, neither fit you. I would return them both.
Thanks for the honest feedback. What specifically is wrong with the jackets? They only cost $150 each. Thought I'd use them for leisure.
Reply
Reply
post #41240 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mktitsworth View Post

Did not get a fit pic in today because of the weather in NYC, however I can personally test that crusty was in excellent taste.

shoe cerkle?
Reply
Reply
post #41241 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:30pm

The spoo talk right now brings up one of the questions ive been having since starting to experiment with the fih knot. Im noticing a lot more of the collar band is visible and the thin part of the tie that wraps around the neck shows a great amount. This looks sort of off to me, but is it normal? Do I just suck at tying this knot?

 

No fit pics for today, but I have an interview for a promotion on thursday, so tomorrow ill have some outfits for you guys to critique. And Im gonna need to get it because you guys are making me go poor with all these new clothes ive decided I must have after hanging around this thread!


Edited by roomiller - 12/10/12 at 8:42pm
Reply
Reply
post #41242 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:41pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by roomiller View Post

The spoo talk right now bring up one of the questions id been having since starting to experiment with the fih knot. Im noticing a lot more of the collar band is visible and the thin part of the tie that wraps around the neck shows a great amount and looks sort of off to me?

No fit pics for today, but I have an interview for a promotion on thursday, so tomorrow ill have some outfits for you guys to critique. And Im gonna need to get it because you guys are making me go poor with all these new clothes ive decided I must have after hanging around this thread!
I'm not sure if there is a hard and fast rule about this. I think you notice the band the most on Finamore, Barba, Borrelli, and other higher end shirt manufacturers. I personally like it, although for pure business professional wear you are better going with a pointed classic collar which makes it practically difficult to have this effect.
Reply
Reply
post #41243 of 51726
12/10/12 at 8:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhors2 View Post


I'm not sure if there is a hard and fast rule about this. I think you notice the band the most on Finamore, Barba, Borrelli, and other higher end shirt manufacturers. I personally like it, although for pure business professional wear you are better going with a pointed classic collar which makes it practically difficult to have this effect.

Damn you caught me before I edited my post into something resembling proper english. Im not wearing high ends shirts but the smaller size of the knot still shows a good deal of band. I think it might just be the change thats throwing me off, and not that it actually looks bad. At school, every moron in a pre-packaged shirt/tie combo used a fih knot so I just have some residual prejudice towards it. 

Reply
Reply
post #41244 of 51726
12/10/12 at 9:12pm

Clapy made a comment on my spread collared shirts about two months ago, suggesting that I make the collar higher. I got three made and am really happy with the results. I had an extra 1.5cm put on, which of course meant that they had to lengthen the collar (wings? what are they called?) 

 

Anyway, in hopes of adding to the discussion:

The slighty higher collar (Click to show)

 

 

1000

 

Original spread collar (Click to show)

 

1000

(I know the shirt definitely doesn't work with anything else here. Too formal. Managing levels of formality is something I struggle with because of wardrobe limitations; most of what I own is pre-SF...I only started buying less formal shirts after sugarbutch took me to school.)

 

1000

 

 

My head is a bit big for my body, so I think the slightly bigger collars are more flattering than the smaller ones. The actual increase was minute, but there's a difference.

Reply
Reply
post #41245 of 51726
12/10/12 at 9:16pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by in stitches View Post

shoe cerkle?

After walking the most of manhattan on a dreary day making the streets full of goo, my shoes were in no condition for a cerkle. Crusty's looked good though.
Reply
Reply
post #41246 of 51726
12/10/12 at 9:50pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mktitsworth View Post

After walking the most of manhattan on a dreary day making the streets full of goo, my shoes were in no condition for a cerkle. Crusty's looked good though.

frown.gif
Reply
Reply
post #41247 of 51726
12/10/12 at 9:58pm
They were not the decos. I had three pairs of shoes with me, and these were the least of them.
Reply
Reply
post #41248 of 51726
12/10/12 at 9:59pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mktitsworth View Post

They were not the decos. I had three pairs of shoes with me, and these were the least of them.

Reply
Reply
post #41249 of 51726
12/10/12 at 11:39pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holdfast View Post

Originally Posted by Albert Hal View Post

Shirt with "Acetonized" collar 1940´s.

Interesting. So, what does that mean? Does it look/feel different?

 

 

 

 

700

 

"Acetoniserad krage" means a permanent starched collar. You just need to iron it when it´s wet The design of the shirt and collar leads me to date the shirt to the 1940´s

Reply
Reply
post #41250 of 51726
12/11/12 at 12:02am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Hal View Post

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)


"Acetoniserad krage" means a permanent starched collar. You just need to iron it when it´s wet The design of the shirt and collar leads me to date the shirt to the 1940´s

Yes, they are from the 40's. I bought a bunch of these shirts from a dead stock and sold them in no time at all. Sweden's got some dedicated vintage shoppers.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Follow Styleforum on Facebook for the latest news and our random ramblings
Derek Rose at Pitti Uomo 83
What Are you Wearing Today, "Streetwear" edition, pictures and discussion
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III