or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III - Page 2004

post #30046 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by acridsheep View Post

I don't want to hear any bitching about SoS' tie. Venerable WAYWRN icons would make good use of it:
Spoo would commission pocket squares out of the fabric and sell them for 3x cost to 75% of Styleforum. NYRanger would demand Epaulet stock long pants in the fabric, and then wear them posing oddly on statues. Acecow would wear it in any format provided it was tight enough.

These inside jokes, acrid, and the fact that I get them, indicate that you and I spend way too much time on SF.
post #30047 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBD View Post

Don't step on 'em Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Gkg6k.jpgiFSVg.jpg

last pic - good to see them in action.
post #30048 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by acridsheep View Post

^ The bagginess of my pants has little to do with the errors in your analysis.
You can't know this because of how new you are here, but I shine in the face of criticism. It is perhaps my only specialty.

Let's get one a few thing sorted ;-

1. You not wearing pants, you may also be wearing pants underneath, but you are wearing trousers.

2. Your trousers are not baggy by any means, they are beautifully styled and drape beautifully, complete with perfect break.

That is my opinion.
post #30049 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by acridsheep View Post

1154

This pair of shoes however need more of a heel. They look as if the heel has worn down through use . You appear down on heel and up on toe. The trousers length in this pic, were not adjusted for these shoes.
post #30050 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronicmole View Post

Spoo- you have all the clothes, all the knowledge..yet.. something is always missing. I don't understand. No shots.

iPhoneography has its limitations.
post #30051 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandbn View Post

Let's get one a few thing sorted ;-
1. You not wearing pants, you may also be wearing pants underneath, but you are wearing trousers.
2. Your trousers are not baggy by any means, they are beautifully styled and drape beautifully, complete with perfect break.
That is my opinion.
Only term worse than pants I hear is the term slacks to describe trousers. I can't stand it. We are pretty casual here down under, and we usually join words together for our slang e.g we say howyagarn instead of how are you going, but men wear trousers and women wear pants, that's all. But Dean, this could just be our non US commonwealth nation upbringing too.
post #30052 of 75830
The rest of the swag from my trip to London - today's shirt and cufflinks.

Suit - BB
Shirt - T & A
Tie - Charvet
Cufflinks - The British Museum
PS - PRL
Shoes - C & J

IMGP2149571x1280.jpg
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

IMGP2148459x1280.jpg

IMGP21441037x1280.jpg

IMGP2145851x1280.jpg
post #30053 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie's Wardrobe View Post


Only term worse than pants I hear is the term slacks to describe trousers. I can't stand it. We are pretty casual here down under, and we usually join words together for our slang e.g we say howyagarn instead of how are you going, but men wear trousers and women wear pants, that's all. But Dean, this could just be our non US commonwealth nation upbringing too.

 Thanks for the explanation. In my case, English isn't my native language and it's good to make corrections like this :)

post #30054 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by RDiaz View Post

 Thanks for the explanation. In my case, English isn't my native language and it's good to make corrections like this :)

 

All it takes for you to stop using a completely legitimate word is some random dudes (no offense) aversion?

 

rotflmao.gif

both pants and slacks qualify as words in the american english language. pants are the same as trousers. slacks are the trousers of a suit. but to each his own.

post #30055 of 75830
Well done, well said, Southernstyle!!
post #30056 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOBD View Post

Don't step on 'em Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Gkg6k.jpgiFSVg.jpg

i hate you. rock on.
post #30057 of 75830
so at SF-XX will pleats be optional or required?

confused.gif
post #30058 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpooPoker View Post

iPhoneography has its limitations.
Has nothing to do with pictures. Just your ensembles
post #30059 of 75830
I like you, Stitch.
post #30060 of 75830
Quote:
Originally Posted by cronicmole View Post

Has nothing to do with pictures. Just your ensembles
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › HOF: What Are You Wearing Right Now - Part III