I'm all in favour of revisionism, but this is probably a step too far.
Interesting... the jacket itself seems splendid, and yet the ultimate look does not particularly flatter Foo. Does that not meant the jacket is actually the 1%, and the Foo is the 99%? I appreciate that this would cause problems with the symbolism of your "chart". Hmm, perhaps we can amend it to saying that since Foo decided to commission the quite lovely jacket, his blanked-out mind in the chart is indeed 1%, and the aesthetic impression on his figure is the 99%...
What was it Levenstein said about statistics, again... 
Very much in tune with my usual appearance; but I leave the exact percentile up to the eye of the beholder...












