Quote:
The D90 deal is pretty good and it's a nice camera - I suspect it's probably due to be replaced within the next year.
The main advantages of the D90 over the D3100 are slightly tougher build quality which allows for better handling and easier access to controls. It will also take older AF lends that don't have a built in motor.
Image quality wise there's next to nothing between them. The D3100 has a newer sensor and a few more pixels, but 12mp are plenty.
The packaged lens is the same on both kits and whilst it's not the most solidly built lens in the world it gives decent image quality for the price.
Personally unless you're a photography enthusiast I'd go for the cheaper D3100, and if you're a photography enthusiast I'd save up and get a D300 or better.
The main advantages of the D90 over the D3100 are slightly tougher build quality which allows for better handling and easier access to controls. It will also take older AF lends that don't have a built in motor.
Image quality wise there's next to nothing between them. The D3100 has a newer sensor and a few more pixels, but 12mp are plenty.
The packaged lens is the same on both kits and whilst it's not the most solidly built lens in the world it gives decent image quality for the price.
Personally unless you're a photography enthusiast I'd go for the cheaper D3100, and if you're a photography enthusiast I'd save up and get a D300 or better.
This is fantastic advice. I've got to keep remembering that 99% of the time the images will only be going on the web.
Will that lens serve me well for both arty Macros and the manequin shots?
Thanks again





).