• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Typeface vs Font

dexterhaven

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
344
Reaction score
7
Ok I know somebody here knows about this. I have googled the hell out of this and gotten nowhere. What is the difference between typeface family, typeface, and font? People seem to be annoyed when these terms are confused, but I fail to see a clear distinction.

For reference, here are the sources that are confusing me:
http://www.fonts.com/aboutfonts/glos...eface%20family
http://www.paratype.com/help/term/terms.asp?code=353
http://www.inspirationbit.com/when-i...typeface-font/

So for example: Is Times the family, Times New Roman the typeface, and then Times New Roman bold one font and Times New Roman italic another font?

One site I read said typeface is what you see and font is what you use. Can someone tell me if that makes sense? Please help.
 

tagutcow

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
625
Originally Posted by dexterhaven
So for example: Is Times the family, Times New Roman the typeface, and then Times New Roman bold one font and Times New Roman italic another font?
This was always my understanding. A font could be a diferent weight or variation of a typeface. Back before digital typography, a different size of type would be considered a different font as well. If you look at different weights of a font, often you'll find the letter forms themselves change. A font family could encompass something like Century Schoolbook and Century Gothic that, superficially at least, seem to have little in common. edit: Apparently Century Schoolbook and Century Gothic have nothing to do with each other… they're not even from the same type foundry!
 

mktitsworth

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
2,866
Reaction score
1,122
Originally Posted by tagutcow
This was always my understanding. A font could be a diferent weight or variation of a typeface. Back before digital typography, a different size of type would be considered a different font as well. If you look at different weights of a font, often you'll find the letter forms themselves change. A font family could encompass something like Century Schoolbook and Century Gothic that, superficially at least, seem to have little in common.

+1. This pretty much sums up my knowledge on the subject.
 

Blackhood

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
376
Typeface: the size, scale, space between, above bellow the letters. Font: The shape of each letter, serif/sans-serif. Font family: The shape of the letters, with variations like Bold or Tall. The shape doesn't change, but the appearance does.
Code:
T H I S I S A W I D E T Y P E F A C E
Code:
THIS IS NOT
Both are the same font, but with different appearances.
 

Blackhood

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
376
Originally Posted by Dakota rube
^You are dealing with kerning here.

Yes, but Kerning is a facet of typeface. I called it Wide because I figured that adding even more new words would complicate things. The point was that the font is the letters, typeface is the relationship between the letters and ways they are manipulated.
 

Dakota rube

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
13,306
Reaction score
237
Originally Posted by Blackhood
Yes, but Kerning is a facet of typeface. I called it Wide because I figured that adding even more new words would complicate things. The point was that the font is the letters, typeface is the relationship between the letters and ways they are manipulated.

No, kerning is a facet of typography.
..."the relationship between the letters and the ways they are manipulated" is also typography.

Here is an interesting discussion from type professionals:
http://www.typophile.com/node/14701#comment-84393

and another:
http://fontfeed.com/archives/font-or-typeface/
 

Parker

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
8,895
Reaction score
15,881
The quick answer as I was taught: Typeface: the unique design of a set of typographic characters (i.e. what it looks like) Font: the physical manifestation of those characters (i.e. the actual thing itself) In the dark ages, a font meant all the cast metal pieces that would form a typeface at a single size, say 12-point Times Roman. The metal pieces have since been replaced by digital vector files which can be scaled to any size. The two terms are now practically interchangeable. I'm a graphic designer fwiw.
 

dexterhaven

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
344
Reaction score
7
Thanks for the information, fellas.


Originally Posted by Parker
The quick answer as I was taught:

Typeface: the unique design of a set of typographic characters (i.e. what it looks like)

Font: the physical manifestation of those characters (i.e. the actual thing itself)

In the dark ages, a font meant all the cast metal pieces that would form a typeface at a single size, say 12-point Times Roman. The metal pieces have since been replaced by digital vector files which can be scaled to any size. The two terms are now practically interchangeable.

I'm a graphic designer fwiw.


Ok so the distinction between the two terms has narrowed with the progress of technology? I fail to see a difference between what a thing looks like and the physical manifestation of that thing. To me that's the same thing. The metal pieces thing you said makes a lot of sense to me.

If I walked by a movie poster and liked the way the title looked, would I say, "I wonder what typeface that is?" or "I wonder what font that is?" Or could I say both?
 

indesertum

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
17,396
Reaction score
3,888
seriously what the hell do you guys not know about
 

tagutcow

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
9,220
Reaction score
625
Originally Posted by dexterhaven
Thanks for the information, fellas. Ok so the distinction between the two terms has narrowed with the progress of technology? I fail to see a difference between what a thing looks like and the physical manifestation of that thing. To me that's the same thing. The metal pieces thing you said makes a lot of sense to me. If I walked by a movie poster and liked the way the title looked, would I say, "I wonder what typeface that is?" or "I wonder what font that is?" Or could I say both?
Both, depending on how specific you want to get. Sometimes a font in a different weight or variation is distinctive enough that you would want to refer to it specifically by name. Kubrick liked to use different weights of Gill Sans and Futura in movie posters and titles, to drastically different effects. Here are the different weights of Helvetica:
37594843209447724.gif
Look at what happens to the x-height of the characters in increasing weights of Helvetica. Also, note well what happens to the tail of the lowercase 'a' between Helvetica 65 and Helvetica 75. Here's a chart comparing Minion Small Caps with Minion Pro actually typed in all-caps (with Wittgenstein for added pretension!):
comparisons-caps.png
 

Parker

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
8,895
Reaction score
15,881
Originally Posted by dexterhaven
If I walked by a movie poster and liked the way the title looked, would I say, "I wonder what typeface that is?" or "I wonder what font that is?" Or could I say both?
If I walked by a movie poster, I'd say "what typeface is that?" If I were handing off artwork to the printer, I'd say "I've included the font." But, like I said, they're for all practical purposes interchangeable these days.
 

bigbjorn

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
618
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by Parker
If I walked by a movie poster, I'd say "what typeface is that?"

If I were handing off artwork to the printer, I'd say "I've included the font."


But, like I said, they're for all practical purposes interchangeable these days.


I think if there's any distinction to be made today, it's that a piece of writing is in a typeface, but the font associated with that typeface includes all letters, numbers, and symbols as represented in that typeface.
 

NOBD

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
8,706
Reaction score
6,213
I love typography talk.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 35.0%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 61 38.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 17 10.8%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 27 17.2%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 29 18.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
505,224
Messages
10,579,601
Members
223,897
Latest member
Hyacith
Top