• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

New logo for the StyleForum

Kappelan

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
2,915
Reaction score
8,848
What do you think, guys?
stylef10.jpg
 

mm84321

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
2,762
Reaction score
7
The bottom one is the least horrible.
 

yjeezle

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
1,404
Reaction score
24
not feeling any of those.

a few questions/comments:

-why are we getting rid of the serif font?
-why choose to red the "f"?
-those chat bubbles look amateurish and looks like i made them on powerpoint
-i think gap went with that weird square design near their logo too. they also dropped it. i would consider you doing the same
- my distaste for this font goes beyond measure
- why did you use a farked up "f"? "It looks cool" is not a valid answer.
- you can do better. try again.
 

mktitsworth

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
2,866
Reaction score
1,122
The top is definitely the best. The other two are cluttered and distracting. I'd polish it.

The font is okay. I like the curves and subtlety, but I think it's overly understated and simple. It's more readable and less compressed than the current. The disproportionate and different font f is jarring and detracts from the symmetry of the rest of the logo. It delineates the word separation so that the random person isn't reading "stylefor" well, though.

Edit: Looking at it, you might do well if you resized the f on the first and offset it as in the third, but without the effects.
 

Gus

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
18,580
Reaction score
8,077
What is this for? Are you supposed to create a new one or hope that SF adopts your suggestion? The existing one reads better than any of these to be candid. Lets stay with it.
 

Lighthouse

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
7,424
Reaction score
1,490
Make the "f" and the "u" red, let's make everyone happy.

Styleforum
 

leeFX

Active Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Is it just me or does the "F" look too 'Facebook-y'?
Everyone and their mother is trying to make their logo accent a letter... just like Facebook and many other popular websites.
 

Anthony K

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
2,170
Reaction score
65
Originally Posted by kwilkinson
WTF? If it ain't broke, don't fix it dude.

+1!
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,929
Messages
10,592,812
Members
224,333
Latest member
SalmanBaba
Top