or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Pocket Squares: A Discussion Thread, Questions, Opinions, Suggestions.....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Pocket Squares: A Discussion Thread, Questions, Opinions, Suggestions..... - Page 10

post #136 of 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketsquareguy View Post


I like how the white square compliments the silver (or grey) colors in his tie. Subtle yet elegant.

The white also brings out the white in his eyes, and if he were to smile, it would bring out the white in his teeth... I have always found that if you have dark hair, or a dark complexion, wearing a little bit of plain white in your outfit will brighten the face.
post #137 of 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketsquareguy View Post
Not for rookies or the faint of heart, advanced pattern mixing from Alan Flusser.



If you described this to me on paper, I would tell you to piss off, would look terrible. Especially the mountain peak fold of the PS.

Picture? I would rock the shit out of this.
post #138 of 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpooPoker View Post
If you described this to me on paper, I would tell you to piss off, would look terrible. Especially the mountain peak fold of the PS.

Picture? I would rock the shit out of this.

I love how he angled the dominant lines of the ps against the suit. It pulls the outfit together.
post #139 of 3881
Thread Starter 
The problem with PhD level pattern mixing is that it is very unforgiving. One slight slip and it is a total fail. Combine the wrong colors and it is an epic fail.
post #140 of 3881
Thread Starter 
White Dinner Jacket and white pocket square


post #141 of 3881
Dont you think that would be more of a handkerchief?
post #142 of 3881
Thread Starter 
The blue shirt, navy sweater and blue and yellow/gold pocket square are an ideal compliment to the color of the suit. Relaxed and with style.


post #143 of 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpooPoker View Post
If you described this to me on paper, I would tell you to piss off, would look terrible. Especially the mountain peak fold of the PS.

Picture? I would rock the shit out of this.

Forget the square. The shirt is sublime.
post #144 of 3881
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by comrade View Post
Forget the square. The shirt is sublime.

Hey fella, save it for the In Praise of Blue Striped Shirts thread. This is a pocket square thread you know........
post #145 of 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarbutch View Post
He puts together such compelling outfits on his mannequins, but his personal appearance is bewildering.

Probably spends time thinking about the mannequins, but when dressing himself just wants to get the hell out the door.
post #146 of 3881
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpooPoker View Post
Dont you think that would be more of a handkerchief?

See below......

From the blog Bows 'n Ties


Is it a "˜pocket square', or a "˜handkerchief'? Are they the same thing?

......the answer to that depends on whether or not you're living in the present day, or 600 years ago. A pocket square, and a handkerchief are, essentially, the same thing; a square piece of cloth worn on a man's person. However, a handkerchief has a much more practical role, being used as a rag for personal hygiene. The story goes that Richard II of England invented the handkerchief, or at least popularized its use, when he described its royal need; "˜as a little piece of cloth, for the lord king to wipe and clean his nose'. Seeing Richard the king do it meant that it must be good idea, and, not to be left behind, the nobility and the upper classes followed suit. But, a good idea is a good idea. By the middle of the 17th century, men from all walks of life were making use of the handkerchief. Then, as now, it was considered unsightly to display a soiled handkerchief, so it stayed in the trouser pocket. Likely the pocket square would never have evolved into the accessory that it is, if men's fashion hadn't evolved first. So, as two piece suits became popular in the 19th century, men began placing their clean handkerchiefs in their breast pockets; allowing them to peek out, and add a bit of dash to their look. Of course, inevitably they would need to be used, and then they went right back into the pants pocket. Eventually, the look of a pocket square as an accessory to a suit became so common, that it became just that; an accessory and nothing more. This attitude toward the pocket square was even further reinforced with the adoption of specific and elaborate folding techniques; obviously not meant to be undone once they had been placed in the breast pocket. By the 1920's, many men would even carry a separate handkerchief in their pants pocket for practical use. The pocket square had hit its heyday. But, with the invention of antibiotics, and after World War II, the classic linen handkerchief was looked on as un-hygienic. And, with the Kleenex company's invention of disposable handkerchiefs, the cloth equivalent fell out of use; leaving pocket squares as nothing but a fashion accessory.


post #147 of 3881
Thread Starter 
post #148 of 3881
Thread Starter 
post #149 of 3881
Thread Starter 
Beautiful relaxed fold by Winston Churchill.
post #150 of 3881


Pocket squares used in a modern way, without looking like you are trying too hard
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Pocket Squares: A Discussion Thread, Questions, Opinions, Suggestions.....