With regard to all the arm-chair experts and "contenders" (or perhaps "pretenders") ...
It reminds me of that old TV show--Survivor. The forum pushed Travers off the island...nature abhors a vacuum.
Perhaps there are two sorts of saddle soap then? One for shoes etc which isnt really saddle soap (just called so for nostalgic reasons) and perfectly fine and the other a true saddle soap which is indeed soapy alkali badness?
Which means that everyones right and we can stop with the handbags? Agreed?
+1. Though I've admittedly been lazy about testing. But hey, I caint making claims.
Again, personal attacks doesn't make you more right or logical in a discussion. Here's my original question:
Aside from being botched by the combination of my butter finger and iPhone auto correct, you obviously did not do any testing for your claims as logical as it might be. A hypothesis without verification.
My point has always been, don't post information authoritatively when there's no proof behind it.
And guess who posted the first factual data point on your hypothesis? Me.
Let me quote pB again on his real life threat.
Thanks for those info. Good to know.
p.s., real-life threat. Cursing and name calling online is one thing, but offering bounties for someone to send a box of shit to me in real life is a whole different level.