or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › ** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread **
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread ** - Page 596

post #8926 of 8935
Thanks Fred.

I'll do a side by side comparison of the Forest to the 348 as well, as you did. What is the length difference between yours and what is your shoe size?

I can see that part of the look of the 348 is also going to be determined by what's on the toe box, for example punched medallion or cap.

So maybe my question is directed to Highbury folks and how they wear them (or Tetbury folks too, as the same issues arise).
post #8927 of 8935
I have shoes on the forest and the 348, both 9.5 UK, and in my opinion, the 348s are battleships in comparison.
post #8928 of 8935
post #8929 of 8935
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGD83 View Post

I have shoes on the forest and the 348, both 9.5 UK, and in my opinion, the 348s are battleships in comparison.


@MGD83 

Thanks you mean much longer? Different from Fred's?

 

Here's a forest versus my highbury (seems to be the same as Fred's)...the 348s are from Barneys but, I am now convinced, at least in this case is not abnormally elongated:

 

 vs 

 

 

I like Fred's 348s and he has nicer shoe trees too. Also, no creasing! How is that possible?

 

Still not sure the 348 PTBs are for me...

post #8930 of 8935
post #8931 of 8935

 Hey Guys, just a random question related to shoe price inflation.  Obviously prices have gone up and demand relative to supply for top shoemakers' shoes has skyrocketed. 

 

What would you estimate say a $700 shoe today would have cost in 2008?  $350, $400, $500, etc? 

 

There may be perfect examples of the same shoe with a MSRP that can be tracked, I'm just not informed enough of any.  Or in general the price points for certain shoemakers can easily be tracked and to see how they've increased over the years.

 

I figured this would be a good place to start.  I'm curious for several reasons.  Thanks. 

post #8932 of 8935
Quote:
Originally Posted by TweedyProf View Post

Thanks Fred.

I'll do a side by side comparison of the Forest to the 348 as well, as you did. What is the length difference between yours and what is your shoe size?

Mine are UK9. The Forest is about 11 3/4" and the 348 is about 12 1/4" so that's a pretty big difference. The lasts are shaped so different though and the way my toes fit at the end is also pretty different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TweedyProf View Post

I like Fred's 348s and he has nicer shoe trees too. Also, no creasing! How is that possible?

The Carminas just arrived from Skoak last week and have only been worn once so far. They were actually a little bit tight so I initially debated returning them, but decided to keep them and see if they would loosen up a bit with wear. The Saphir shoe trees (from NMWA) are sized very full so I put some conditioner on the shoes to soften the leather, crammed the size 43 Saphir trees in, and left them in overnight, which stretched them just enough to make them comfortable.
post #8933 of 8935

Tweedy I meant that they feel much longer overall. I'm almost certain I could have went down a half size in the 348.  Width seems to be similar though. I'll take a couple of measurements of my shoes tonight.

post #8934 of 8935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred G. Unn View Post


Mine are UK9. The Forest is about 11 3/4" and the 348 is about 12 1/4" so that's a pretty big difference. The lasts are shaped so different though and the way my toes fit at the end is also pretty different.
So funny (given issues about US to UK conversion which I think you saw with the Barney's Tetburys), but my UK8 Forest I measure about 11.75 inches and UK8 348s about 12.25!!! Anyway, the difference is what I care about and that's about the same on your end and mine. I agree with Fred that I might be in with a half size smaller...
The Carminas just arrived from Skoak last week and have only been worn once so far. They were actually a little bit tight so I initially debated returning them, but decided to keep them and see if they would loosen up a bit with wear. The Saphir shoe trees (from NMWA) are sized very full so I put some conditioner on the shoes to soften the leather, crammed the size 43 Saphir trees in, and left them in overnight, which stretched them just enough to make them comfortable.
Posted pics of these yet in the Skoak thread? Looking forward to them (did you get hit with duties?).

Thanks again Fred and MGD83

post #8935 of 8935
Yeah, I posted the Carminas on the Skoak thread here: http://www.styleforum.net/t/338047/skoaktiebolaget-carmina-eg-gg-bonafe-official-affiliate-thread/9600_30#post_7699102
No duties as of yet.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › ** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread **