or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › ** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread ** (reviews, quality, etc...)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread ** (reviews, quality, etc...) - Page 667

post #9991 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbadbuff View Post


While you're right that it is a pattern imprinted over older calfskin, that process does make it a harder wearing shoe and more weather resistant. There's a reason it is a common material on casual English shoes. If you call C&J for example and tell them you want a shoe with good water resistance this is what they are going to recommend to you...

 

Any calf that is imprinted, rolled or pressed....makes its pores more oclussive.  I think that is the reason for its water resistance (and the use of waxes of course)

post #9992 of 12788
I am thinking through options on a future boot project to keep my mind busy and was hoping for a bit of help from some members that own multiple pairs of shoes in the 348 last. I'm not sure when I'd do a MTO, won't be able to for awhile, but I like to have a plan.

I'm wanting a sleek black Jodhpur with a Dainite sole. I recently did a catch and release on a pair of black Cottesmores from Barney's because they too chunky for what I was wanting. One option is to go the Skoaktiebolaget MTO Carmina route and do it on the Simpson last, but I'm not anywhere close enough to feeling comfortable about their sizing yet. A simpler yet more expensive option would be to go C&J MTO and just have a 348 black Cottesmore made up with Dainite sole. But I only have one 348 lasted boot for reference and I live in Alaska, so I don't have the option to try anything on in store.

In Crockett and Jones I wear 8.5E in my 348 lasted Tetburys, loose 9E in the 325 lasted Islay style boots I have from Purdey, and my 335 lasted Skyes are 9E and the fit my foot's shape perfectly. There is room in front of my toes on the Skyes, but its perfect everywhere else, so there is no movement. The only other 348 lasted shoes I've had were a pair of Barney's Highburys, but they were US size 9.5D and I really don't know how that would correlate.

I've read varying opinions on the fit of the Tetbury compared to other 348 lasted shoes. I've read they run large and I've read they run small, sometimes the same. If I were to do an MTO of a jodhpur, would it be best to stay 8.5E, or would it be prudent to size up half? I want the boot to be able to be worn with a suit, so I get worried about over sizing it and losing the elegance.

Any help from C&J veterans would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!
post #9993 of 12788


For what it's worth, I have 5 shoes on the 348 last. My black, brown and suede Hallam are all size 9, I did opt to go to 8.5 for Milton (unlined suede) and Tetbury (suede) because of the absence of a cap and consequently the ever so slightly roomier toe box. The Tetbury is considerably tighter than the Oxfords, but after breaking it in, it became comfortable enough for me to walk around in it the whole day.

post #9994 of 12788
Okay thanks for that. I may lean towards with the 8.5E then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
post #9995 of 12788

post #9996 of 12788
My new Cavendish Loafers, finally a C&J loafer that fits me well:

Cavendish1_zpsnegqtllc.jpg
More pics: (Click to show)

Cavendish2_zpsrqstcpwu.jpg

Cavendish3_zpsbncqfbzl.jpg

Edited by alexSF - 9/3/15 at 6:45am
post #9997 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexSF View Post

My new Cavendish Loafers, finally a C&J loafers that fits me well:


Cavendish1_zpsnegqtllc.jpg
More pics: (Click to show)

Cavendish2_zpsrqstcpwu.jpg

Cavendish3_zpsbncqfbzl.jpg

I have these in dark brown suede and I love them... After seeing your pic side by side with the polo suede I think I will have to pick up a pair.
post #9998 of 12788
http://www.crockettandjones.com/product/chelsea-3-chestnut

Anyone have the Chelsea 3 on the 238 last? How does the 238 fit in relation to other lasts, say, the 348, 341, 325, HG 358, etc.? I have numerous C&J lasts, but not the 238. Thanks in advance ....
post #9999 of 12788

Hi all,

 

I was wondering if someone might be able to help me with sizing for the 325 last with an E width. My only item from C&J at the moment is a size 8E Chiltern on the 224 last. Overall, the 8E is ever so slightly too wide and a bit loose over the instep, but that could probably be because the last isn't too perfect for my feet.

 

How would you suggest I size on the 325 last with an E width?

 

Thanks in advance.

post #10000 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by chocol8max View Post

Hi all,

I was wondering if someone might be able to help me with sizing for the 325 last with an E width. My only item from C&J at the moment is a size 8E Chiltern on the 224 last. Overall, the 8E is ever so slightly too wide and a bit loose over the instep, but that could probably be because the last isn't too perfect for my feet.

How would you suggest I size on the 325 last with an E width?

Thanks in advance.

What model in 325 last you have in mind?

325 is already a narrow width and it's overall narrower than the 224: if you look at your Chiltren you'll notice that are also much more rounded than a 325 last shoe even just watching a pic of it.
The Chiltren also have a high laces up, and are suede:
so you might try a ( no boot ) model with a lower lace up
and a calf or a scotch grain model instead of suede one.
( this regarding the loose fit subject you mentioned )

In my opinion if your 8E 224 last are just a bit wide as you said, you shouldn't change size for a 325 lasted model
post #10001 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo Da Vinci View Post


What model in 325 last you have in mind?

325 is already a narrow width and it's overall narrower than the 224: if you look at your Chiltren you'll notice that are also much more rounded than a 325 last shoe even just watching a pic of it.
The Chiltren also have a high laces up, and are suede:
so you might try a ( no boot ) model with a lower lace up
and a calf or a scotch grain model instead of suede one.
( this regarding the loose fit subject you mentioned )

In my opinion if your 8E 224 last are just a bit wide as you said, you shouldn't change size for a 325 lasted model

Thanks for the information Leonardo, much appreciated. With regards to the model, I am hoping to jump in on the last available spot for the Lindrick GMTO. I shall keep the size as 8E for now but if you feel that as it is for a boot I would need to change the fit, I shall certainly welcome the additional insight.

post #10002 of 12788
Bought some Harvard today

departure for me, but very pleased

Carry on
post #10003 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeknal View Post

I have these in dark brown suede and I love them... After seeing your pic side by side with the polo suede I think I will have to pick up a pair.
These are amazing. I assume last 325 now days and hence 8.5E EU is 9.5D US. Nonetheless outstanding.. Wondering which one was RL no doubt sized US. Thanks..
post #10004 of 12788
post #10005 of 12788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo Da Vinci View Post

What model in 325 last you have in mind?

325 is already a narrow width and it's overall narrower than the 224: if you look at your Chiltren you'll notice that are also much more rounded than a 325 last shoe even just watching a pic of it.
The Chiltren also have a high laces up, and are suede:
so you might try a ( no boot ) model with a lower lace up
and a calf or a scotch grain model instead of suede one.
( this regarding the loose fit subject you mentioned )

In my opinion if your 8E 224 last are just a bit wide as you said, you shouldn't change size for a 325 lasted model

I have shell Onslows (325 last) and suede Chilterns (224 last) in both 8E. For some reason the Onslows feed longer and wider to me.

Here is a side by side of them.



New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › ** Quintessential Crockett & Jones Thread ** (reviews, quality, etc...)