mxgreen
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 1,018
- Reaction score
- 210
We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
My experience with C&J's puts me in Sartorial's camp on this one.
I am TTS US9.5D. I have various C&J's on various lasts, some calf and some shell, some tie and some monks, and I wear UK8.5E in them all. And the US-sized C&J's from BB I own are US9.5D.
Sorry but you are wrong. Crockett & Jones customer service informed me a couple of years ago that shoes marked with a US size are 1/2 size more than if the shoes were marked with a UK size. C&J specifically stated that a UK 11.5E is a US 12D.
with a few notable exceptions (IE: Namor, Sartorial, etc), men with smaller feet have better taste.
with a few notable exceptions (IE: Namor, Sartorial, etc), men with smaller feet have better taste.
You are dead wrong. Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of teh shoes.
Tala about style, I will bury anyone with style. Check out my collection.
You are dead wrong. Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of the shoes.
Robert Old is great, I definitely recommend them. I recently inquired about a pair of Westbournes, they said they would reserve me a pair in their next order due for November 1 delivery from C&J.
All is correct US sizes are up 1. C&J are correctly sized to correspond to -1 of US size.
with a few notable exceptions (IE: Namor, Sartorial, etc), men with smaller feet have better taste.
You are dead wrong. Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of the shoes.
Talking about style, I will bury anyone with style. Check out my collection.
Shoes in small sizes are slightly better looking than the cardboard box they come in. No details, small vamp, boxy and tiny. Feel sorry for you with small feet.
You are dead wrong. Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of the shoes.
Talking about style, I will bury anyone with style. Check out my collection.
Unless you wear US sizes, you are confused and just responding to create unecessary fuss.
Shoes in small sizes are slightly better looking than the cardboard box they come in. No details, small vamp, boxy and tiny. Feel sorry for you with small feet.
I'd still rather have small feet than a small tiny mind !!! To say "Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of the shoes!" is just complete utter bollox ffs !!! IMHO
1) Take Deep Breath
2) Re-Read Post (said nothing about the look of small shoes vs. larger ones + Did not comment on this C&J size question + actually COMPLIMENTED you)
3) Exhale and Pour Glass of Good Scotch
4) Drink & Buy More Shoes!
Relax, it was a joke. Actually design is based on economics and using less materials, not size.
Oh grow up if you cant take it please refrain from giving it !!! A Quintessentially English Crockett & Jones Semi Brogue Belgrave in "Small Size!" perfectly showing its style lines and curves i would say !!Thank you. I would not expect less from you. You're a credit to your race.I'd still rather have small feet than a small tiny mind !!! To say "Small shoes do not show the style, lines, and curves of the shoes!" is just complete utter bollox ffs !!! IMHO