Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › Wonder Woman
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Wonder Woman - Page 3

post #31 of 107
This sounds terrible.
post #32 of 107
Megan Fox is bankable/bangable. I’m surprised they didn’t do everything to get her onboard. Wrestling diva Eve Torres would have been a good fit for a more glamazon type WW. From an acting point of view, Evan Rachel Wood would have been an inspired choice.
post #33 of 107
Am I alone in thinking that, if I never see Megan Fox in another movie again, I won't have much of a problem with it? Chick is way overrated, both in talent and in looks. She had a couple of really hot ass shots in Transformers, but come on. I need something slightly more from a leading lady than an occasionally favorable camera angle.
post #34 of 107
^^ you are true in your thinking. However Megan Fox's look would make a good wonder woman.
I would rather pick someone else for sure.
post #35 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimusPilus View Post
From what I've read about the show, she'll be playing three different characters: (1) Wonder Woman; (2) Diana Themiscyra, CEO of some company bearing her name; and (3) Diana Prince, Diana's "mousy" assistant. So, Wonder Woman is going to have two secret identities, and will be playing her own assistant. Sound like disaster to me, but will still watch to check it out.

that sounds awful.
post #36 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sesame Seed View Post
Megan Fox is bankable/bangable. I'm surprised they didn't do everything to get her onboard. Wrestling diva Eve Torres would have been a good fit for a more glamazon type WW. From an acting point of view, Evan Rachel Wood would have been an inspired choice.

I've only seen Evan Rachel Wood in True Blood and The Wrestler, and she was absolutely horrible in both. Jessica Biel is the obvious choice.
post #37 of 107
Thread Starter 
It's Wonder Woman not Wonder Man.
post #38 of 107
If all of the above is true, then, a lingerie clad showdown between WW and the villainess is all that is needed to redeem the series.
post #39 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sesame Seed View Post
Megan Fox is bankable/bangable. I'm surprised they didn't do everything to get her onboard. Wrestling diva Eve Torres would have been a good fit for a more glamazon type WW. From an acting point of view, Evan Rachel Wood would have been an inspired choice.

I read that Fox said WW was lame and did not want to be play her. It might have been in relation to a movie version though.

Oh, and Fox is hot but waaay over rated. AB has it right.
post #40 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mute View Post
If all of the above is true, then, a lingerie clad showdown between WW and the villainess is all that is needed to redeem the series.

It would be an excellent fap fest!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal View Post
I read that Fox said WW was lame and did not want to be play her. It might have been in relation to a movie version though.

Oh, and Fox is hot but waaay over rated. AB has it right.

I agree. She's smokin' hot and really nice to look at, but way too overated.
post #41 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
Am I alone in thinking that, if I never see Megan Fox in another movie again, I won't have much of a problem with it?

Chick is way overrated, both in talent and in looks. She had a couple of really hot ass shots in Transformers, but come on. I need something slightly more from a leading lady than an occasionally favorable camera angle.

No. I've said it here before a few times. I don't find her hot at all. She's got a really fucked up face for a celeb. She just wears hoochy clothes and guys forget she has a face.
post #42 of 107
Obviously Megan Fox is extremely hot. But so are thousands of other women. She brings nothing to a film.
post #43 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
I've only seen Evan Rachel Wood in True Blood and The Wrestler, and she was absolutely horrible in both. Jessica Biel is the obvious choice.

She was sexy as holyfuckingshit in True Blood. Come on now, son.
post #44 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadly7 View Post
No. I've said it here before a few times. I don't find her hot at all. She's got a really fucked up face for a celeb. She just wears hoochy clothes and guys forget she has a face.

I agree with this. Her face looks like a fucking piranha or something, and her body is nice but not nearly as nice as people think it is. She just dresses like a Las Vegas hooker.
post #45 of 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Carlos View Post
Am I alone in thinking that, if I never see Megan Fox in another movie again, I won't have much of a problem with it?

Chick is way overrated, both in talent and in looks. She had a couple of really hot ass shots in Transformers, but come on. I need something slightly more from a leading lady than an occasionally favorable camera angle.
I'd like to see Megan Fox in a Tarantino film, preferably getting her mutant toes sucked. It's the only thing I'd care to see from either of them. Tarantino could give Linda Fiorentino the lead and once again use Michael Madsen. They'd play Fox's parents. Faye Dunaway and Bob Hoskins play an unhappily married rich couple. Have some incest going (Fiorentino/Fox), and you've got yourself one hell of a heist film.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
I've only seen Evan Rachel Wood in True Blood and The Wrestler, and she was absolutely horrible in both. Jessica Biel is the obvious choice.
I thought she was pretty good in The Wrestler. She was good in Whatever Works. She'd certainly make a more talented muse for Woody than Scarlett.

Quote:
Originally Posted by deadly7 View Post
No. I've said it here before a few times. I don't find her hot at all. She's got a really fucked up face for a celeb...
No worse than Angelina Jolie.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › Wonder Woman