STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Not really. Granted I tend to idealize Ervell earlier collections a bit but this stuff is just dull recycling of boring pieces without any coherence, oh cool more horse hair braided **** !
his collections have always been recycling.
this one looks slightly...older (as in less boyish). I get the feeling that that's because a) the models are a bit bulkier than normal, b) a lot of them could stand to size up 1.
e.g. look 8 could be from any of his past seasons. contrast with look 10 etc. I also think the pieces are styled a bit un-creatively; windbreaker under blazer was genius, everything is styled too classic here.
I like Ervell pieces because of the fit and cut, not the creativity. I agree with tz0d that his pieces are staples and should remain through further refinement, not to just follow fashion trend like pretty much all other designers
It's a good thing that he moves slowly and recycles. I want that. It's menswear, and I'd rather see more of the same moving slowly and deliberately than something that feels forced. Great menswear lines are known for staples and product personality. They use these as trademarks which appeal to a customer base that, when satisfied, likes to stick to what they know and like. It was already said on here before that incorporating a women's line might be a bad thing, mostly because it sacrifices timeless elegance for escapist cosplay. Menswear is completely different. More refined, elegant, genuine, honest, conservative, discerning:
The pressure to constantly reinvent yourself and be "interesting" just leads to forced work with too many bells and whistles to compensate for inspiration. I prefer refinement.Menswear is all about these little details and slight changes in proportion, but for women’s wear you have to turn up the volume. And that somehow makes it less interesting: a change of a centimeter in menswear can be very powerful; in women’s wear it’s usually meaningless.
Tarmy: So your menswear line’s aesthetic doesn’t change dramatically from season to season?
Ervell: No, there’s never a seasonal jump. Men don’t dress that way. No one actually says, “This season, India is my inspiration,” or whatever. That’s nonsense. It’s much more interesting to develop a specific language for a brand.
And,
Tarmy: Why bother with the cost and hassle of a fashion show, then?
Ervell: I’m not sure it makes sense to have a fashion show anymore. I know that 99% of the people who see the clothes from my show aren’t seeing them in person but on a computer. So is there a more clever format to present my clothing every season?
Of course there is. But it’s tricky, because I’m part of an industry with a specific way of doing things.
I don't think our opinions on this differ, so I don't believe there was any reason to reiterate your position.
The minute I see Jared Leto with a horsehair belt and university cap, I'm going to rethink my aesthetic.