Quote:
Originally Posted by
indesertum 
are there such things as blu ray players that give out better video or audio quality? like with audio/video quality of a ps3 be less than a dedicated one?
There are only a few situations where different BD players can have different video quality: 1. You're using the analog video outputs. 2. You're using HDMI into a TV whose native resolution is different than the disk's. 3. You're playing back material shot with interlaced cameras. An example of 2 would be playing a 1080i disk into a 720p TV. The player or TV has to do scaling. Playing back DVDs is another example. Oppo 93 has really good scaling. PS3 is OK. An example of 3 would be a live concert or sporting event which are usually captured with an interlaced camera. Not all disks marked as 1080i end up interlaced --- some are shot on film, and the original 24p signal can be reconstructed exactly, like most Hollywood films. You will see the quality of the deinterlacer here --- the Oppo 93 has one of the best deinterlacers I've ever seen. The PS3 is OK. There are smaller, more subtle things that a player can do like noise reduction, but for the most part, if you're playing back a movie shot on film, which hasn't been too mangled in the mastering or editing process, all BD players will look pretty much the same when connected through HDMI to a TV whose native resolution matches the disk's. For audio, different players have different jitter measurements, different DACs, and emit different kinds of EMI. Depending on the quality of your receiver or whatever's receiving and playing back the audio data, there can be no to huge differences. If you use the player's analog outputs, there can be big differences. FWIW, I use a PS3, but I have an external DVDO scaler/deinterlacer that runs a Pioneer 150FD at its native resolution. --Andre