or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Is cordovan all that?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is cordovan all that?

post #1 of 266
Thread Starter 
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?
post #2 of 266
I've had a pair for over 2 years that are holding up very well. I really do my best to beat them to death and they dont even flinch.
post #3 of 266
Is cordovan all that?

It's all that and much more.
post #4 of 266
It's not rare... it's just expensive. I know I'll get hate for it, but it almost always look plasticky to me. Who knows, maybe it'll grow on me later.
post #5 of 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketprotector View Post
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?

it takes 6 months to tan the hide that makes 1 pair of shoes.
they could tan a calf leather hide that makes like 4 pairs of shoes in an hour.

what makes more financial sense?
post #6 of 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicguy View Post
I know I'll get hate for it, but it almost always look plasticky to me.
To appreciate it as it should be ... it takes a degree of sophistication some lack.
post #7 of 266
I've seen some cordovan shells listed on ebay that cracked around the opening of the shoes. They are not all that die-hard fans have made it out to be but I certainly wouldn't do without them. Popularity is a tricky word here, they appeal to some people but at the same time, because as you say, they are rare and difficult and expensive to acquire, that surely has some effect on how "popular" it is.

Some like their distinct charateristics such as the "ripples" instead of microcreases on calfskin but to me, I prefer a buffet of various uppers, with calfskin, suede and cordovan in the top 3. I know their advantages and disadvantages and I find no need to lean to any single choice.
post #8 of 266
Thread Starter 
Well, it is certainly refreshing to hear that it is indeed good stuff. Most of the hype I've heard is from AE salespeople; naturally I'm reluctant to believe such a personally interested party
post #9 of 266
I was skeptical until I handled some at a store.

I'm in the minority on this, but I think shell looks best when it's on boots. The ripples look off on "smaller" shoes such as loafers, and sometimes even overpowers oxfords and derbys. On boots, however, they can look just right.

Aside from construction and toughness, #8 shell cordovan really just has an incredibly, incredibly rich color in real life. You really ought to check them out at least.
post #10 of 266
Can't speak for boots, but I love them on monkstraps. They can instantly dress "up" an outfit while looking cool.
post #11 of 266
less...
post #12 of 266
Shell cordovan is alpha as fuck.
post #13 of 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fab Style View Post
Cordovan is just another type of leather. The only diff is that it is more porous making it more durable and softer

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixrecon View Post
less...

Yeah, it is less porous.

I remember when I first got into shoes and heard about cordovan I thought it would be the only kind of shoes I would ever buy again. For me its novelty as slightly worn off and I realized that it is best suited for certain applications as people mentioned above.

I think it looks great on boots, but if you really want a dressier shoe the pull up effect can be a little much, even in black, although adding character. It is also a chunkier leather and can be a bit inconsistant with ripples, and bubbles in certain areas. I just don't think it looks as sleek as calf and while producing its own kind of "glow" it doesn't shine up like calf does.
post #14 of 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketprotector View Post
Cordovan is rare. If it was all that great, wouldn't it be more popular?

They tell me 1) it doesn't crease 2) scuffs buff out far more easily than with leather 3) they last forever and keep looking new blah blah.

How much of this is legend vs reality?

Well, the average person looks to spend $50-$100 on shoes. The cheapest new Shell Cordovan shoes are ~$500. To me, that explains why they are not popular amongst the general population.

I personally only like shell on wingtips, but that is just me. When the shoe is relatively plain, I find the rippling draws too much attention. On a wingtip, there is a lot going on design wise, so the creasing is less noticeable.
post #15 of 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpooPoker View Post
Shell cordovan is alpha as fuck.

the new SF mantra
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Is cordovan all that?