• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Johnston Murphy

SimplyStylin

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
312
Reaction score
280
I previously posted in this thread photos of my Hardings, whose soles had completely cracked. Subsequent to posting in this forum, I contacted Johnston & Murphy, who asked me to mail them back to them for inspection. I did, and they replaced both pairs. But, a year later, they're cracking again. The cracks haven't gone all of the way through, so I can still wear them as "beater" shoes, but its certainly not worth resoling them, putting new heels on them, etc.

Do you think that Johnston & Murphy would replace them again? On the one hand, at the price I paid for them, I wasn't expecting the highest quality in the world, but their sole has cracked completely through twice in three years.

3 years total use for a pair of shoes at the price is great IMO, even if it took a warranty repair to get there. I probably would expect a year to a year and a half of real wear out of a pair of sub $150 shoes (depending on how much you wear them of course), so I'd personally move on once they fall apart much more.
 
Last edited:

StylinProfilin

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2015
Messages
106
Reaction score
139

Originally Posted by dieselman89
Alle Edmonds are expensive! And they are all very old man/traditional looking shoes.
I disagree. I think you're getting exactly what you paid for as far as quality. A very good pair of shoes but certainly not the quality of $600+ shoes. As for old man/traditional looking......there are a few staples they have been selling for years (Park Avenues) but they also have some very sharp looking shoes. I recently purchased some AE Strands in Walnut and I absolutely love them.
This all day.
400
 

BespokeBrooklyn

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
639
Reaction score
238
Thoughts on the Conrad wingtip? The ones on sale for $110 look allright, but I would really only wear them in the summer, possibly with seersucker or something similar. The full leather ones look pretty cool, but $155 is the very upper limit of what I would pay for non-resolable shoes.

 

Curbed Enthusiasm

Active Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
38
Reaction score
6

Thoughts on the Conrad wingtip? The ones on sale for $110 look allright, but I would really only wear them in the summer, possibly with seersucker or something similar. The full leather ones look pretty cool, but $155 is the very upper limit of what I would pay for non-resolable shoes.
If you like the style, fit, and price, then go for it. I know J&M is very unpopular (for some good reasons) on SF, but I have to say I've been very happy with my Crown Aristocraft Conley wingtips. The leather is top notch and they fit me great. I picked up a new pair that had a minor scratch on the sole for peanuts on Ebay. They are well-constructed and made in the USA. But, for $375 retail, I'd still rather buy AE.
 
Last edited:

BespokeBrooklyn

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
639
Reaction score
238
If you like the style, fit, and price, then go for it.

I know J&M is very unpopular (for some good reasons) on SF, but I have to say I've been very happy with my Crown Aristocraft Conley wingtips. The leather is top notch and they fit me great. I picked up a new pair that had a minor scratch on the sole for peanuts on Ebay. They are well-constructed and made in the USA. But, for $375 retail, I'd still rather buy AE.
 

WatchMeSpend

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2017
Messages
84
Reaction score
224
Look, J&M has some good styles BUT... you will never achieve the patina or shine that you can get with non corrected grain leather. I'v e got a pair of Stacy Adams that look just as good, but the CG leather won't hold a shine or shine very well. I would have considered a pair of Johnston & Murphy a month back, but I just got some Cole Haans that are more comfortable, but I am just not happy with the sh!tty look of CG leather. I will spend the extra and never look back. I tried my best, but my AE shoes and boots look more awesome from 20 ft away then corrected grain shoes do up close. I really hate to tell you guys that you can't cheap out on shoes and get the same look of quality even though you have the proper style.

Seriously, the leather inside my AE boots and shoes is leaps and bounds better that the stuff on the outside of Cole Haan / Johnston and Murphy.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,453
Messages
10,589,466
Members
224,244
Latest member
Classic Furniture
Top