• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Do you sympathaize with eco-terrorists?

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by NorCal
Interesting that you would write that considering your sig. By your definition Ben F. was nothing more than a common criminal.
Really? I guess you don't know anything about the American Revolution, or what Ben F. tried to do. Might want to get a good history text book, read it, and get back to us. EDIT: Perfect example, I must say, about the "spin" I was referring to when it comes to eco-terrorists -- well done, and bravo (it's part and parcel of what eco-terrorist organizations do in fact do, I agree, so a beautiful parody on your part; but nothing funny about blowing up people or property, etc., in the name of a fanatical cause, to which my sig is on point, and for which eco-terrorists need to answer in a court of law).
 

NorCal

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
9,985
Reaction score
4,682
Originally Posted by Avocat
Really? I guess you don't know anything about the American Revolution, or what Ben F. tried to do. Might want to get a good history text book, read it, and get back to us. EDIT: Perfect example, I must say, about the "spin" I was referring to when it comes to eco-terrorists -- well done, and bravo (it's part and parcel of what those eco-terrorist organizations do in fact do, I agree, so a beautiful parody on your part; but nothing funny about blowing up people or property, etc., in the name of a fanatical cause, to which my sig is on point).
**** you you Canuck Cocksuker. Don't profess to lecture me on my own revolution. Oh, and liberty is not a fanatical cause so don't attempt to paint our glorious revolution in that manner.
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by NorCal
**** you you Canuck Cocksuker. Don't profess to lecture me on my own revolution.
Oh, and liberty is not a fanatical cause so don't attempt to paint our glorious revolution in that manner.


Puff the magic dragon, lived by the sea ... MORON.
 

NorCal

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
9,985
Reaction score
4,682
Originally Posted by Avocat
Puff the magic dragon, lived by the sea ... MORON.

Go **** a moose...moran.
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by NorCal
Go **** a moose...moran.
Not interested in you, thanks .... moose hunting is over for the season. Are all of you eco-terrorist recruits as dumb as a door knob, or is it just you? It's moron, not moran: MORON. Back to the topic of the post, "Do (I) sympathize with eco-terrorists?" Like I said, Nope.
 

Interzone

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I don't know if I'd label them as terrorists. Arsonists, sure.

Originally Posted by erictheobscure
To some degree, yes. Their frustration and extreme tactics clearly stem from a reasonable source: they see that our insistence on a particular style of life has very negative consequences--and that some of these consequences might be disastrous and irremediable. I suppose the middle-of-the-road sentiment is to pooh-pooh disruptive or violent measures in general. But I find this highly disingenuous. Sustaining the kind of lives that many or most of us enjoy entails all sorts of unjust acts that we have the luxury of ignoring--ranging from horrid labor practices to decimation of natural resources to covert or large-scale warfare. That said, the problem of legitimizing violence for a cause is obviously a thorny one.

That pretty much sums up my feelings.
 

Fuuma

Franchouillard Modasse
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
26,949
Reaction score
14,542
Originally Posted by NorCal
**** you you Canuck Cocksuker. Don't profess to lecture me on my own revolution.
Oh, and liberty is not a fanatical cause so don't attempt to paint our glorious revolution in that manner.


Avocat is a fine addition to the CE (meaning he's a marsupial).
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Fuuma
Avocat is a fine addition to the CE (meaning he's a marsupial).
*Yawnz* If we used you as a yardstick, most on CE would be brain surgeons compared to yourself (though most are marsupials, and love to argue nonsense just like yourself). Meantime, I already told you that I don't swing your way, so best you stop wasting your time and go hit on someone else
devil.gif
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Pantisocrat
I just read a report stating that eco-terrorists are among the FBI's most watched domestic terrorist groups. And that a large part of them are based out of Oregon. Seeing how there's so little discussion on this topic, I'd like to hear the opinions of the fine folks here.
To bring this post back on topic, I just thought I'd bring to everyone's attention an article in the Washington Times, stating that Osama bin Laden claims he waged war on the US to defend the environment from the evil polluting US, and save the planet by setting up an Islamic organization (to be headed up by himself of course). You can read more about it here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...en-goes-green/ No, Norcal: killing innocent civilians and destruction of property, etc. by fanatical terrorists like bin Laden or eco-terrorists isn't comparable to US colonists-turned-revolutionaries who were fighting for basic rights against oppression and tyranny, and even then only took up arms when attempts by Ben F. (and others) at reasoning with the offshore King fell on deaf ears; but attempts to negotiate only made things worse for the colonists. The next thing you know, armed British soldiers were firing at armed American soldiers. Eco-terrorists, like PETA who funded ALF, kill/injure unarmed innocent civilians and/or damage civilian property, etc. Sad thing is, some people fall for fanatical propaganda, else these orgs wouldn't be getting donations, much less volunteers. Already expressed my opinion on the matter and sticking to it: nothing glorious about terrorism, at all. tl/DR: according to the Washington Times, Osama bin Laden claims he had no choice, citing environmental concerns. Believe it? (rhetorical question, no need to answer, but the article is quite illuminating).
 

NorCal

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
9,985
Reaction score
4,682
Originally Posted by Avocat
Not interested in you, thanks .... moose hunting is over for the season. Are all of you eco-terrorist recruits as dumb as a door knob, or is it just you? It's moron, not moran: MORON.

get-a-brain-morans.jpg


The "A" is for America and that means liberty.
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by NorCal
get-a-brain-morans.jpg
The "A" is for America and that means liberty.

Liberty is spelled with an "L" -- like in Canada's Maple Leaf. But for you to equate eco-terrorists with Ben F. as you did is anti-American, anti-west and anti-Liberty. It also means that you must sympathize with Osama bin Laden, who calls himself an eco-warrior. Don't think the big guy in the picture who can't spell any better than you would like you equating Ben F. to a criminal eco-terrorist either ... just a piece of friendly advice: you might really want to re-think that. EDIT: Just adding a link to the RCMP's "Hug-a-Tree" program: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/hugtree-pr.../index-eng.htm (teaching kids to enjoy the great outdoors so that they grow up to be good environmentalists without getting lost in the woods).
 

Nosu3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
3,244
Reaction score
43
Originally Posted by Avocat
Eco-terrorists, like PETA who funded ALF, kill/injure unarmed innocent civilians and/or damage civilian property, etc.

What civilians has PETA killed?
 

Teacher

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
12,135
Reaction score
407
Originally Posted by Nosu3
What civilians has PETA killed?

He means they're extremists whose disruptive, arrogant, and self-important attention-grabbing antics make the rest of us who simply care about animals look bad right along with them.
 

Avocat

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by Nosu3
What civilians has PETA killed?
I didn't say PETA killed civilians. I said PETA members have committed assaults against civilians and a federal minister, which are criminal acts (read the link to the news article and see for yourself why it is that charges under the anti-terrorism provisions are being urged). ALF and the ELF, however, are violent animal rights extremist groups in the US, their members being charged with a host of serious crimes, from arson to blowing up buildings and cars, and bomb threats (endangering lives, intimidation and causing serious property damage). It's only a matter of time before someone dies, and they're known to the FBI. Do a google search and see how PETA allegedly provides aid in the form of donations and/or contributes to the cost of legal fees, etc. for these terrorist groups (and also see how these terrorists "ethically" treat human beings and private property). Seriously, though, did you not know this?
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.3%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.2%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.5%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 36 15.8%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,486
Messages
10,589,897
Members
224,253
Latest member
Paul_in_Buffalo
Top