"SF Approved" Items You Can't Get Behind - Page 10

Don't go there...

Which one?

Loafers. I HATE loafers.

I partly agree about the wholecuts. In (dark) suede, or with some brogueing on the toe, they can look OK. However the plain leather models in the pictures make me think of some eyeless, cave-dwelling abomination.

I do, however, absolutely love double monks. But the again, I have never, ever worn velcro shoes.

Ridiculous gimmicks such as
-felt flowers;
-bracelets;
-fun socks.

I also do not like flat front trousers.

Flat front trousers are just an abomination...

Bracelets on a man over 25?

Do not start me on that one...

+1

I have just one pair of flat front trousers ... and for the life of me I don't know why I got them that way.

Look good on young, slim men, 'specially Mohair. Most of my pants are flat fronted...

Do I know you?

Northerner...

...do you, want to know me?

That's right, non of that southern shandy drinking shite for this northern boy. Oh, and it ain't grim up north, well not in Cheshire anyway.

Biblically? Remember ... I did go to English public school for a while.

Good to see that you survived it.

I've fallen victim to some of these but such is life:

- Rolled up raw denim in excess of 2 inches

- Fake shoe or briefcase patina

- Lapel flowers or other trinkets

- Vox

- Hong Kong tailors

- Unnecessarily large shirt buttons

- Laceless dress shoes that aren't single or double monks

- Single breasted peak lapel jackets other than the black tie variety

- Hats, of any kind

- Shell cordovan wingtips

- Shoes that cost over $2,000

- Spread BD shirts (yes I'm talking about you gdl)

- Solid coloured silk pocket squares other than cream or white

- "Bond" style turn back dress shirt cuffs