Quote:
Originally Posted by
Piobaire 
I think you are reading something I didn't write into what I said. I tried to specifically indicate I'm not going to pop for a big $ wine off a wine list. However, I am certainly going to order wine with my meal, as I enjoy food and wine together. You seemed to be saying either food or wine, not both at the same time. I am still pretty much not for a great bottle of wine by itself. I certainly wouldn't have a gem with a meal meant to be the focal point but neither would I just drink the wine alone. Again, I stand by what I said. IMO, food and wine go together and their being together enhances my enjoyment of both. Just decide which is the star of any particular meal.
I think it depends on what kind of food we're talking about. With spectacular wine I really want food to take the back seat. With something haute cuisine, I don't think you're particularly well served by having great wine.
Something as subtle and sophisticated like a great Margaux, to me, is almost destroyed by food. I might be oversensitive, I don't know. I love good wine so much that I'd rather devote my full attention to it, even though that isn't the tradition.
Different strokes, like I said I'm happy you're a patron of good food and wine. There need to be more people like you. But my best wine memories are when I've had wine alone or with the food very much taking a back seat.
In a restaurant I'm most likely to order something off the wall and not expensive, probably like you do. I have a big problem paying more than a couple hundred bucks for a bottle in a restaurant. That $200 I'm spending could buy me a Silex or Pur Sang with change.