STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Josepidal posted in another thread that the shoes that started this thread are most definitely not EGs.Originally Posted by pkincy
If the past average US retail mark-ups are any guide, Edward Green was letting Ralph have those Corbens for under $148 a pair. Should you feel there was a possibility of that happening, I've got some Enron stock for yaOriginally Posted by Christofuh
I think the assumption/hope is that they were simply mispriced. I can't imagine any PL laceup retailing for $325, regardless of maker (or how much Ralph paid).Originally Posted by DocHolliday
That said, A Harris was certain these were EGs ... I wonder if perhaps the woman Josepidal spoke with was ill-informed. Perhaps Polo named the shoes differently than EG was expecting? Who knows what's really going on?Originally Posted by DocHolliday
From past experience EG and C&J were very familiar with their Polo lines.Originally Posted by josepidal
All this questioning had me wondering if my own evaluation of the pic was perhaps wrong. Then I remembered that I've never seen a non EG shoe with the RLPL script on a dark sock (there are some C&J ones with the script, but it is always on a tan sock.)Because the picture is of what is most definitely an Edward Green shoe.
Where did the email come from? Polo store in London or the EG store? If the email came from Polo, did you ask who made the Corben?Originally Posted by von Rothbart
Dear Sir,Originally Posted by josepidal