Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › Moet Vs Veuve Cliquot Vintage Champagne
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Moet Vs Veuve Cliquot Vintage Champagne

post #1 of 6
10/18/10 at 4:43am
Thread Starter 
I have a reason to celebrate and wanted to either purchase the Moet Chandon Champagne Grand Vintage 2003 or the Veuve Clicquot Vintage 2002. Any suggestions?
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 6
10/18/10 at 4:45am
Moet is piss. VC is passable, vintage 2002 is not bad. I'd rather a Taittinger or Bollinger Grande Annee for about the same price.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 6
10/19/10 at 7:42am
Although Moet is normally shit, the Grand Vintage 03 was actually really a nice drop. Depending on what price you can get it for, i would put it comparable to Roderer or the Ruinart Blanc de Blanc NV(which is one of my favourites)
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 6
10/19/10 at 9:22am
Quote:
Originally Posted by impolyt_one View Post
Moet is piss. VC is passable, vintage 2002 is not bad. I'd rather a Taittinger or Bollinger Grande Annee for about the same price.

Yeah but nobody at the club knows what Bollinger Grande Annee is, and it'd probably look like a cheap alternative to Moet at the club when OP sits down at his table, attempting to attract looks from gold-digging cum guzzlers.
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 6
10/21/10 at 5:48am
Thread Starter 
The Bollinger Grande Annee is not at the price point as the Moet and Veuve mentioned. I ended up going with the Veuve Vintage as it was discounted. On my next bottle I will probably have to drop down to a non-vinatge and I will try one of the other brands suggested in this thread.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 6
10/21/10 at 6:01am
You could get a nice Dom Ruinart for what those two cost.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel › Moet Vs Veuve Cliquot Vintage Champagne