Opinion re this Bell & Ross watch? - Page 2

Subscribe Search This Thread

« Previous
1
2
Next »

Start a New Thread

post #16 of 21

10/14/10 at 9:03pm

bleachboy

Posts: 1,800
Joined: 9/2008
Location: Nashville
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhall41

Thanks for the suggestion - I looked up the Glycine Incursore - unfortunately, at 46mm it is too large for my 6.5 inch wrists!

46mm?!? That's a goddamn hockey puck.

post #17 of 21

10/14/10 at 9:11pm

Thread Starter

bhall41

Posts: 571
Joined: 8/2008
Location: Australia
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by bleachboy

46mm?!? That's a goddamn hockey puck.

My 42mm PO is pushing what I can get away with - there is no way I could wear a 46mm watch. The Sinn 656 at 38.mm would be perfect for me in terms of size.

post #18 of 21

10/14/10 at 9:38pm

mcfmcf

Posts: 40
Joined: 6/2010
Location: NYC/Atlanta
Select All Posts By This User

Nice watch - I prefer the square models from Bell & Ross, but I like the minimalist taste of that one.

Not really a fan of IWC so I'd go with this if it suits your style.

post #19 of 21

10/14/10 at 10:49pm

Thread Starter

bhall41

Posts: 571
Joined: 8/2008
Location: Australia
Select All Posts By This User

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcfmcf

Nice watch - I prefer the square models from Bell & Ross, but I like the minimalist taste of that one.

Not really a fan of IWC so I'd go with this if it suits your style.

Cheers. I love the IWC Portuguese range, so I am not anti IWC by any means.

post #20 of 21

10/14/10 at 11:11pm