Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Sleek chukka that is not Tetbury
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sleek chukka that is not Tetbury - Page 3

post #31 of 33
11/3/11 at 3:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ich_Dien View Post

True, the 348 is an abomination in my opinion.

i have 348 in form of chukkas and standard (i.e. "lowcut") shoes.
on chukkas, i agree. other shoes? do not
Reply
Reply
post #32 of 33
11/3/11 at 5:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trompe le Monde View Post

i have 348 in form of chukkas and standard (i.e. "lowcut") shoes.
on chukkas, i agree. other shoes? do not

I used to own a pair in 348 myself and just never wore them.
Reply
Reply
post #33 of 33
11/3/11 at 6:59pm
The AS53 last makes for a good chukka.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Men's Clothing
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Men's Clothing › Sleek chukka that is not Tetbury