or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment, Culture, and Sports › NBA 2016-2017 Season Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

NBA 2016-2017 Season Thread - Page 413

post #6181 of 27247
so the Lakers beat the Heat, then proceed to lose to Detroit and Washington in succession.
post #6182 of 27247
D-Rose!
post #6183 of 27247


Whats Griffin pointing to after being blocked?
post #6184 of 27247
Quote:
Originally Posted by embowafa View Post

God damn, Lakers.....GOD DAMN
Also, FUCK YOU ENTIRE TEAM

+1,00000

but it seems like they get a string like that every season. i'd really like to know what hte inside-the-lockerroom chemistry is like.
post #6185 of 27247
Thread Starter 
That Clippers loss last night. baldy[1].gif
post #6186 of 27247
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodguy View Post

+1,00000
but it seems like they get a string like that every season. i'd really like to know what hte inside-the-lockerroom chemistry is like.

I think like most Laker fans, they are not fond of Mike Brown.
post #6187 of 27247

I don't know how this is mike brown's fault. When you only have three players on your entire roster that can score and one of those three shoots 9 for 31, how do you expect to win?

 

This is a personnel issue more than anything.

post #6188 of 27247
yeah, i kind of agree with moffy. it's pretty tangled. kobe shoots too much so the other players slack off and then kobe shoots more because nobody is working. and then of course, there's just the whole "king of the world" syndrome. it's happened repeatedly this year and in years past ... just when they get offense running smoothly, pau will attempt a needless behind-the-back pass on a fast break, or drew will decide he's going to dribble, or some other nonsense and they lose all focus.
post #6189 of 27247
I agree. It is more Kobe's fault. I do think Mike Brown has had some problems. Especially when it comes to communication with management. Why did the Lakers pick up Josh McRoberts and Jason Kapono if Mike Brown was never going to play them? Why didn't they amnesty Luke Walton? Mike Brown has only played him a dozen times.
post #6190 of 27247

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by deveandepot1 View Post

I agree. It is more Kobe's fault. I do think Mike Brown has had some problems. Especially when it comes to communication with management. Why did the Lakers pick up Josh McRoberts and Jason Kapono if Mike Brown was never going to play them? Why didn't they amnesty Luke Walton? Mike Brown has only played him a dozen times.

 

I don't necessarily think that the problem is Kobe. The problem is that they don't have a point gaurd. Pau and Bynum do not create their own shots. They need someone to get them the ball in their spots or to run the pick-and-roll with them. How many times do you see the offense fail to get the ball into the post and then just dump it out to Kobe to bail them out?

 

Some of this is due to Mike Brown's offense. The personnel doesn't work in it. Essentially, it was built for the triangle, which is not what they run anymore. That's why I think if the Lakers were to get someone like Sessions, it would fix some problems.

 

Also, Kapono doesn't play because he's terrible and was an awful signing. He should have been out of the league two years ago.

 

I think Murphy plays over McRoberts because he can spread the floor better and they desperately need that. Though I think what McRoberts lacks in spacing he makes up for it in all other aspects, so I'd rather see McRoberts play too.

 

As for Walton, he's not going to get amnestied. He's an expiring contract next year so they'll try to deal him at next year's deadline to some team that's trying to dump salary before the Draconian luxury tax rules kick in during the 2013/14 season. However, almost gauranteed that Artest will be amnestied. Most likely after next season though.
 

 

post #6191 of 27247
Thread Starter 
Lakers are losing because they miss this guy.



RiZFu.jpg
post #6192 of 27247
it's kind of a shame that they traded jordan farmar. he was a bad fit for the triangle, but might have been just what they needed in this new pick-roll based offense. his defensive shortcomings aside. he could penetrate and he could hit the spot-up.
post #6193 of 27247
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodguy View Post

it's kind of a shame that they traded jordan farmar. he was a bad fit for the triangle, but might have been just what they needed in this new pick-roll based offense. his defensive shortcomings aside. he could penetrate and he could hit the spot-up.

Ummm, from what I remember, Farmar left not traded. He knew he wasn't going to get ahead of Fisher so he went and signed with New Jersey.
post #6194 of 27247
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFX45 View Post

Ummm, from what I remember, Farmar left not traded. He knew he wasn't going to get ahead of Fisher so he went and signed with New Jersey.

you're right. i shouldn't have used the word "traded" since they didn't get anything for him ... declined to renew his contract, encouraging him to leave.
post #6195 of 27247
Thread Starter 
I thought the Nets just offered him more money?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Styleforum › Forums › Culture › Entertainment, Culture, and Sports › NBA 2016-2017 Season Thread