or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › S&H Cavendish = C&J?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

S&H Cavendish = C&J? - Page 2

post #16 of 18
This pics is from my cell phone, which makes them a little crappy...


The toe box is definately wider than my other monks, but those are C&J single monk in the 324 last (or something, I can't recall right now). One of thier narrowest lasts.
post #17 of 18
I should also point out, while it is impossible to tell from these photos, the finishing on the shoe is less than fantastic. When I got them, there already appeared to be some flaking of the wax on the toe box and the like. A quick attack with some conditioner and a little elbow grease with some shoe cream took care of it, but I was a bit miffed. And they have a funky smell when new. Not quite the "new leather shoe" smell I was used to with my aldens and C&J's.
post #18 of 18
thanks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › S&H Cavendish = C&J?