Originally Posted by JMRouse
This is how I see it. STAR TREK should have sucked. It's a reboot of one of the most classic franchises in Sci-Fi. Cast with a bunch of young actors replacing icons. No way it should have been a good film. So when someone says they liked the movie except for the lens flares, my reaction is GOOD. If that's your only complaint then it's a solid win for the film.
A lot of people hate on Batman's voice and it's very much the same thing. How many complete failures have we seen with comicbook films over the years? TDK was fucking amazing on its own, let alone stacked up against previous comicbook films. Who gives a fuck how his voice sounded?
I never said Star Trek sucked I enjoyed it good boys own style escapist adventure movie. I said it was merely good, wasn’t really a Star Trek movie and contained some sucky things(didn't list them all). Lens flare was the least of those sucky things.
I also didn't say TDK sucked I said it was overrated. It was merely a reasonable comic book movie with a completely overrated villain and a ludicrous and way overrated performance by Ledger. What was up with his makeup as well? Was he supposed to be a middle aged drunk whore? Also just because it was better than the first set of fucking terrible Batman movies doesn’t make it fantastic.Edited by Fang66 - 2/8/12 at 6:23pm