• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

BoO: Help Me Understand

kgmessier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
2,472
Reaction score
315
Context has this Band of Outsiders shirt for $275: http://www.contextclothing.com/item.php?id=1612 Epaulet has—as far as I can tell—similar shirting/fit for half the price. Can someone help me understand the price difference? I'm seriously considering this BoO shirt, but I'd like to know what I'm getting into before I drop a huge wad of cash on it. Is the quality really that different? - Keith
 

Kvc06

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
128
BoO isn't worth retail, and this is coming from a huge fan.
That said, at around $100 dollars the shirts are excellent.
The most I've paid is about $215 for the summer madras shirt which unfortunately I sold.
Currently I only own a blue oxford and have a black blazer coming in the mail, I love them but wouldn't have paid retail.
 

Gingahbman

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
23
Originally Posted by Kvc06
BoO isn't worth retail, and this is coming from a huge fan.
That said, at around $100 dollars the shirts are excellent.
The most I've paid is about $215 for the summer madras shirt which unfortunately I sold.
Currently I only own a blue oxford and have a black blazer coming in the mail, I love them but wouldn't have paid retail.


+1.

I love BOO, but would never ever pay full price for it. Personally, the Epaulet shirts fit better on me anyways. However, both are quality shirt manufacturers.

I say try to get a BOO shirt on discount and pick up an Epaulet shirt as well. That way you can easily see what brand works for you.
 

kgmessier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
2,472
Reaction score
315
I have seven Epaulet shirts in size M, so I know that works for me, but they don't have anything in the fabric of this particular BoO offering. Do these shirts ever go on sale, or should I be turning to eBay?

- Keith
 

Razele

Distinguished Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
5,579
Reaction score
627
BoO got pretty ripped off, on the forums here and IRL
 

xr4ti

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
149
Reaction score
8
They go on sale but since this shirt is new from the FW lineup it's going to be a while before anyone lists this on sale. Context does have flash sales so you should follow them on twitter and definetly sign up on their email list. But could be a while.... Good Luck
 

phildo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
546
Reaction score
0
There was an thread posted here a while ago about why designer clothes cost how much they do and there was a link with an interview with some BoO guy. It basically comes down to paying higher labour costs for a lower run of clothes, higher fabric + material costs, then brand markup and store markup.
 

Meis

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
2,980
Reaction score
839
Originally Posted by kgmessier
Context has this Band of Outsiders shirt for $275: Epaulet has—as far as I can tell—similar shirting/fit for half the price. - Keith
It's not a good comparison. What BoO does (the sort of shirts) and the fit they use -- is not that similar to Epaulet. BoO is going to fit shorter and generally tighter/slimmer than Epaulet in the same size. I think a much better comparison would be Gitman vintage vs Epaulet, the fit and stying are more alike. I'm not saying someone wouldn't own both BoO and Epaulet shirts, many do, but theres definite differences between the two that cause people to want one or the other. Also, in going with what everyone else has said, you have to factor in sales. Epaulet almost never puts its shirts on sale (which they have no reason to do, their shirts normally sell out at full $), while BoO almost always goes on sale and most people around here get their BoO for around $80-120... so in the end it somewhat evens out. I've gotten almost all my BoO shirts for less than the retail of an Epaulet shirt.
 

kgmessier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
2,472
Reaction score
315
Originally Posted by Meis
It's not a good comparison. What BoO does (the sort of shirts) and the fit they use -- is not that similar to Epaulet. I think a much better comparison would be Gitman vintage vs Epaulet, the fit and stying are more alike. I'm not saying someone wouldn't own both BoO and Epaulet shirts, many do, but theres definite differences between the two that cause people to want one or the other.
Interesting point. I have Epaulet and Gitman Vintage, and I find their fits similar (although Gitman seems a bit less slim-fitting). How does BoO's fit compare with Gitman and Epaulet?
 

Kvc06

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
128
Originally Posted by kgmessier
Interesting point. I have Epaulet and Gitman Vintage, and I find their fits similar (although Gitman seems a bit less slim-fitting). How does BoO's fit compare with Gitman and Epaulet?

Shrunken to body slim fit
 

Meis

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
2,980
Reaction score
839
Originally Posted by kgmessier
Interesting point. I have Epaulet and Gitman Vintage, and I find their fits similar (although Gitman seems a bit less slim-fitting). How does BoO's fit compare with Gitman and Epaulet?
In my size, compared with either- BoO is going to fit a couple inches shorter, maybe inch / half inch slimmer through the chest, very slim in the sleeves, more taper (also gitman kinda flares out at the bottom), and the BoO will also have a bigger difference in the hem back-front vs sides. Both are slim, but will have very different looks to them.
 

kgmessier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
2,472
Reaction score
315
Originally Posted by Meis
In my size, compared with either- BoO is going to fit a couple inches shorter, maybe inch / half inch slimmer through the chest, very slim in the sleeves, more taper (also gitman kinda flares out at the bottom), and the BoO will also have a bigger difference in the hem back-front vs sides. Both are slim, but will have very different looks to them.
This is good to know. Epaulet seems to fit me a little better than Gitman, although I could go a tad slimmer. Sounds like BoO might be just my fit.
 

MIKE_JE

Distinguished Member
Affiliate Vendor
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,956
Reaction score
5,890
I don't own any epaulet so I can't compare, but I can tell you basic rule of thumb for BoO is to size up in their button downs and oxfords. I'm always a size small and I wear a medium in BoO. Also note that BoO shirts fit fairly short. You wint have much wiggle room in a tucked BoO shirt. If you are tall and skinny, I would try it on first, or measure well. The only exception to the size up rule is their polo shirts. I wear a size 1 in the polo (equivalent to small) and it fits me perfectly. Like everyone else here, I've never paid retail for BoO and it always goes on sale, eventually.
 

kgmessier

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2010
Messages
2,472
Reaction score
315
Just want to say you guys have been excellent help so far. I'll wait for a sale before diving into BoO. Sounds like the Medium is still the size for me.

- Keith
 

KitAkira

Wait! Wait! I gots an opinion!
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
8,589
Reaction score
118
Originally Posted by MSSneaker
I don't own any epaulet so I can't compare, but I can tell you basic rule of thumb for BoO is to size up in their button downs and oxfords. I'm always a size small and I wear a medium in BoO. Also note that BoO shirts fit fairly short. You wint have much wiggle room in a tucked BoO shirt. If you are tall and skinny, I would try it on first, or measure well. The only exception to the size up rule is their polo shirts. I wear a size 1 in the polo (equivalent to small) and it fits me perfectly. Like everyone else here, I've never paid retail for BoO and it always goes on sale, eventually.

Not really, unless you're comparing ****** mall brands which use "American" (read: for fatties) sizing, BoO fits true. XS: 34, S: 36, M: 38, etc.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 41 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.5%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,933
Messages
10,592,923
Members
224,338
Latest member
Antek
Top