The Desktop PC Building Thread - Page 16

Just saw this post on the front page, haven't really looked through too much but thought I'd post my build. Case: Lian-Li PC7-B Processor: Intel i7 920i OC@3.6ghz Cooling: Scythe Mugen II Mobo: ASRock X58 Extreme GFX: Sapphire Radeon 4890 Vapor-x PSU: OCZ ModXstream Pro 650W or 700W (I forget) HDD: Seagate Barracuda 1.5TB RAM: OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 1600 Planning on adding an OCZ Revodrive 128gb for my OS and programs when prices drop a little or on a black Friday sale or something. I need a soundcard, but I've been doing okay with onboard sound optically routed to a receiver. Hooked up to a 1152p Samsung 23" monitor at the moment.

Interesting thread, I haven't done something like this since a very long time ago, when 8gb ram was unheard of and america online was new. Questions: What OS are you guys running? Anyone using an open source OS? Anyone "illegally" using OS X? Have you had any firmware issues? It used to be a lot less complicated to build a system yourself. Not the actual construction, but integration was a lot more straightforward. Simpler parts for simpler OS. Another Q: Is it true some manufacturers produce more efficient parts? For example is there any truth to say, Samsung RAM working better than a cheaper ram of the same spec?

oops double

Yeah there is one within 30 minutes of me (St. David's, PA). I will have to check them out. I bought my Core i7 920 from the same store. I just haven't figured out what specs to put in my HTPC. I'm gonna rifle through my stack of Maximum PC magazine to see if they've got any cheaper HTPC builds.

I'd love to be able to play games on my HDTV but it's no big deal if I can't. My current PC monitor is a 27" LCD so it's plenty big enough when you're sitting 2 feet away.

I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 and Windows 7 on my box I built back in April. I have to disagree though, it is way less complicated to build a new computer nowadays than it was back then. I had no problems with firmware or anything like that. As a matter of fact, my Gigabyte motherboard came with an app called @Bios that allows you to update your bios from within Windows, very easy. Also, hard drives and optical drives being SATA now also makes things way easier. No more need to worry about ribbon cables or master/slave jumpers.

I'm running Windows 7 on all my machines (except my 7 year old Thinkpad) and I'm very pleased.

Hardware has become easier to install and manage, however you have to make sure that all the hardware is compatible, such as knowing if you need DDR2 or DDR3 ram based on your Motherboard or matching your mobo and CPU sockets; those are the big ones, pretty much everything else is standard across the board right now.

I'm not saying the Sempron can't do HTPC duties, it's just that he said he wanted to do some gaming as well and I don't think the Sempron can really handle that well unless he plans on playing SC1 or D2. Considering the Sempron plus a mobo will run him around $70-80, he's best off going for the Micro Center deal with the Phenom II X2 555 and free mobo for $93. That phenom chip is incredible; it's very, very fast and I was able to unlock my brothers to a quad core and OC to 3.6ghz with the unlocked multiplier. A lot of bang for buck there.

As far as hardware efficiency, most components come with wattage use numbers, or you can find real world power usage in reviews online. Most CPU's will come with a TDW Watt number which will give you an idea of the power consumption and heat generated at max load. Some ram requires higher voltages to run, but these are usually higher speed chips too. New video cards like the Nvidia Fermi line (460 excluded) are VERY power hungry and generate a ton of heat. In general the ATI cards are cooler and less thirsty. Some hard drives are marketed as "green" or "eco" tend to use less power, quieter, and last longer in theory, but they're also a bit slower in the benchmarks. It all depends on what you value and you can build a system from there.

7 on my desktop...its great. I jumped from XP (which I still use at work...not a big deal) and it is quite a nice system. Gotta be the best windows ever--it is fast and works right.

Ubuntu 10.4 on my netbook...I actually just upgraded it and am not sure what is different from 9.10 other than the color scheme but I wanted to try it out for:

Ubuntu 9.10 on my HTPC. I want to switch this to 10.4 (10.4 is a LTS release which means patches and support for many years) but I have to make sure all of the tweaked A/V stuff works right. It has some custom scripts for auto-sleep (based on torrent, network share and XBMC activity rather than the standard mouse usage metric) and has working VDPAU and HDMI audio. It took a little while to get everything worked together and displaying perfectly on my TV so I am afraid to change it up. I really should switch to 10.4 though so that I can just leave it alone with patches for the life of the machine (and I should do this before the next version comes out so there is still good support if I can't get it to work).

OS X 10.5 on a old G4 ibook...I actually have not turned this on in months. It was set up as a party-computer...removed file menus and hid the dock from itunes and required a password to run any other programs (kept random people from opening youtube and breaking the flow of music). Since I am not in college (and neither are my class of 2010 friends...and I broke up with my class of 2011 girlfriend...), I don't really see any parties filled with people I don't know in my near future. I should probably sell it while it still has some value...but isync+missing sync (symbian) is the only way I can figure out to sync my phone with google contcats.

Ubuntu 10.04 is the best yet. 9.10 was a disaster. I'd can't recommend enough wiping your HD clean and installing 10.04 (clean install, never 'upgrade' an OS). It's not much in the way of new features, the but the LTS releases are more focused on stability. A LTS will be supported with updates for 3 years. Even if you don't like 10.04 for some odd reason, I'd go back to 9.04 rather than 9.10. 9.10 has wayyy too many broken apps, bugs, etc. that have been hammered out in 10.04. Also, regardless of version, all Ubuntu users should periodically go in the Synaptic manager and delete the old Linux kernels. It can really junk up your GRUB boot menu if you are dual booting. If you aren't dual booting, you probably won't notice but those old kernels will still be there taking up space. I leave the two most recent kernels in case the newest one is screwey, I can always boot into the older one. But if you do updates regularly, chances are you have 5 or 6 old kernels that are just sitting there taking up space. edit: What I do is make a text file with all my commands/tweaks/setups/etc so when I upgrade the OS, all I have to do is paste that text file into the command line. All of my apps and settings are loaded with one command.

I haven't had that much trouble that *I* couldn't solve with 9.10 but I see what you mean about it being a mess...I had to do way too much work to get everything working that worked in 9.04 (on the netbook...I didn't have the revo for 9.04).

I have always preserved my home directory and done clean installs...but on my netbook I decided to try the dist-upgrade procedure. I figured at some point they must figure it out without breaking things. I have not noticed any problems doing it this way. I won't do it for my htpc but I was mostly lazy (I have had less time/interest in twiddling with these things lately) and wanted to see 10.4 and it seemed to work fine.

Heh I'm just happy 10 fixed the Brasero burner. It's been broken since 9.04. K3B is a great alternative, but man, I don't like junking up my system with a bunch of KDE dependencies when I don't have to. Also, AVIDemux ROCKS for video editing. I was always complaining that Linux had no good equivalent for VirtualDub, but then AVIDemux came along and answered all my prayers. Even better than Vdub.

Hey again guys, good news I managed to build the build I posted a bit earlier in this thread. Here's the final build. Case: Coolermaster CM 690 II Advanced - Window CPU: Intel Core i5-760 Heatsink: Coolermaster Hyper 212+ Thermal Paste: OCZ Freeze MB: Asus P7P55D PRO Sound: Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi - Xtreme Music PSU: Antec TruePower New Series 750W - blue led Video: MSI GeForce GTX 460 Cyclone 1GB Overclocked Ram: G.skill Ripjaws 4GB DDR3 1333Mhz (2x2G) F3-10666CL9D-4GBRL HD: Samsung F3 1 TB DVD/RW: LiteOn iHAS-524 No pics or benchmarks yet I'm afraid, but I can tell you it came to around $1370 AU and doesn't include keyboard, mouse or monitor (I had them from my old computer). Some points, firstly the case is gorgeous and very well designed and nice and roomy, everything is pretty easy to get through, the cabling holes help a lot in getting around as does the removable bottom 4 HD trays, which is a great place to store your unused cables. The heatsink is massive and a bit awkward to install as a result, I would recommend installing it after you install the motherboard otherwise it's a bit harder, though still manageable. My Windows XP Install BSOD'd on first attempt with "pci.sys" 0x0000007E error, turns out this is a common error which is easily fixed by slipstreaming SP2 onto your Windows XP install and reburning the installation to a CD or DVD (I used a DVD because I had no CDs, worked great), after this I had no issues. The soundcard, Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi, is a bit of a let down, it makes the odd crackling noise when sound is played, apparently this is an uncomfortably common problem with the X-Fi's, perhaps due to the bloatware drivers that come with it (and unfortunately there aren't any easy to obtain third party ones from my brief research). I'll have some benchmarks hopefully towards the end of the week if the computer is stable till then, so far I've been able to run StarCraft 2 on all highest graphics with not a sceric of framedrop, we'll see how it goes in the tests though. I plan on overclocking it when I have the time, currently just did a 'basic' overclock through predefined bios settings from 2.8 to 2.93ghz, nothing major but its still something for nothing (well, almost nothing). Thanks again for everyone's help and suggestions re: the build, it's much appreciated.

Any reason you're running XP? That video card is DX11...you're missing out on a lot of eye candy by not using W7.

I thought the CM 212+ wasn't that cumbersome, perhaps I am just used to handling large heatsinks.

Otherwise it sounds like a nice build.

W7 is the sucks. I hate this OS. Granted, I've been spoiled by Linux as of late, but still...

"the sucks" isn't really an explanation...

I haven't had any qualms with W7 whatsoever. I've run linux on several machines and while it's great for certain applications, I think overall W7 is hard to beat, especially if you plan on gaming.

I built my own desktop not too long ago. Bought everything from Newegg. I've been really happy with the performance.

Here's my build:

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/Pu...umber=13016612