or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Wings + Horns F/W 2010
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Wings + Horns F/W 2010 - Page 47

post #691 of 799
anyone know of a place that has size 28 in stock for moleskin utility pants or willing to sell your pair ?

thanks in advance.
post #692 of 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosswound View Post
anyone know of a place that has size 28 in stock for moleskin utility pants or willing to sell your pair ?

thanks in advance.

eat a sandwich and buy my 30's
post #693 of 799
no thanks.
post #694 of 799
^^Query: is the inseam on those motherfuckers REALLY 30"? I want some but damn, I mean I would basically have to boot tuck them whenever I wore them. Which isn't the end of the world exactly it's just irksome.
post #695 of 799
Nomad has a 29 in the dark brown at more than 50% off.
post #696 of 799
the moleskin utility inseam on 28-33's are 30.5"
post #697 of 799
FML. I need to somehow convince those guys to make a pair with 34" inseam. Who the fuck is that designed for? Oh right asians.
post #698 of 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by AR_Six View Post
FML. I need to somehow convince those guys to make a pair with 34" inseam. Who the fuck is that designed for? Oh right asians.
Quoted for goddamn truth. Harsh, but so true.
post #699 of 799
last summer they made a pair of pants...the ventile. waist sizes 28-30'something had a ridiculous inseam of like 29 or 29.5"..

at 5'8 it hits me about a half inch above the shoe. it looks good at that height, imo. but its funny that a 6' person couldn't even wear the pant if they had a somewhat skinny waist..

i am now wondering what % of w/h output is shipped to the 0rient..
post #700 of 799
I'm 6'"1 - 6'2" and was really irked they didn't make a 34" inseam pant until I actually tried on their pants. The 32" inseam is actually deceiving in that it actually feels longer than it is and I think it's because of the way the pants are cut. They sit a little lower than other pants which is why I'm assuming they make the seat area so roomy.
post #701 of 799
Yeah see I'm 6'2 and would take a 31 or 32 waist size. I used to wear their jeans no problem but apparently now hemming is just no longer available as an option. What gives? It only really annoys me because I really like the brown ones.
post #702 of 799
moleskin utility at 5'8" worn proper on waist: 6'2" it wouldn't work (edit; i guess you would have to try them on to decide..), you're right. which sucks. really surprised they don't make 2 options. Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
post #703 of 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by slack tide View Post
last summer they made a pair of pants...the ventile. waist sizes 28-30'something had a ridiculous inseam of like 29 or 29.5".. at 5'8 it hits me about a half inch above the shoe. it looks good at that height, imo. but its funny that a 6' person couldn't even wear the pant if they had a somewhat skinny waist.. i am now wondering what % of w/h output is shipped to the 0rient..
That's outrageous! Those pants would look ridiculous on me, as I'm 6''1. They'd look like cargo flood pants. Crazy. I'm still trying to understand why W+H stuff and BoO stuff is cut so ridiculously small. I'm a XXL in BoO for fucks sake. Edit: Slack, that is so disappointing, as I was thinking about copping a pair. They're so nice. Goddamnit..oh well.
post #704 of 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by slack tide View Post
moleskin utility at 5'8" worn proper on waist: 6'2" it wouldn't work (edit; i guess you would have to try them on to decide..), you're right. which sucks. really surprised they don't make 2 options.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

It'd only work in the sense that they'd have to be constantly boot tucked. I'm still thinking about just doing that. I boot tuck everything lately anyway.
post #705 of 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psydelik View Post
That's outrageous! Those pants would look ridiculous on me, as I'm 6''1. They'd look like cargo flood pants. Crazy. I'm still trying to understand why W+H stuff and BoO stuff is cut so ridiculously small. I'm a XXL in BoO for fucks sake.

Edit: Slack, that is so disappointing, as I was thinking about copping a pair. They're so nice. Goddamnit..oh well.

BoO is for anyone under 5'10" and doesn't lift more than a 5 pound weight. Even if the shoulder and p2p work the length is shorter than a t shirt. I'm not saying I'm a huge guy by any means but if anyone grew up playing sports then they'll have a hard time fitting properly in BoO.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › Wings + Horns F/W 2010