Quote:
Originally Posted by
burningbright 
Really? I'll admit it's been a number of year since I read the graphic novel, but I thought that the V for Vendetta movie was nothing like the graphic novel. The Wash-outski brothers' treatment was way too polarized and came off as blatant sermonizing. Moore's perspective, on the other hand, provided a more even-handed approach by examining both sides of V's anarchy and the government's facist state. It's one of the components that I thought made the graphic novel so good; you could actually see both points of view.
Not a bad movie in and of itself but I really could have done without the Wachoskies telling me where my moral conscience needs to stand when it comes to social issues. First rule of writing: show, don't tell.
Preaching aside, I think V for Vendetta is a great example of a comic book adaptation for non-comic readers. It established the main plot and theme of the comic without bogging down watchers with little details they wouldn't fully understand. It certainly piqued my interest enough to sit down and read the trade paperback.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JD_May 
This would only really help if Whedon was writing the Avengers. Though his directorial skills are solid, I don't know what you're complaining about. He has a particularly good eye for lighting and colour... though honestly, the cartoonish way Marvel has done their movies to date (I get why they do it but I don't really like it) is not exactly conducive to that sort of thing. I agree to the extent that this isn't really a good fit.
+1.
...And what the hell is going on with that Thor pic? I was never a fan of the comic, but seeing Odin and Loki makes it look really hokey.