Quote:
Originally Posted by
poorsod 
The side gusset design is not as secure as laces. In my case, the combination of side gussets, a soft skinned leather and stiff sole contributed to too much slippage. I sent them back so they could be tightened up. Tony Gaziano thinks that the oxford design is most optimal for fit.
I avoid buying expensive RTW these days because the fit is not as good as bespoke.
I have asymmetric feet, narrow heel and wide forefoot, the combination of which is difficult for RTW to fit.
In the same camp here. 9.5 EEE left, 10.5 E right. Average to 10 EE. Heel width normal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jerrybrowne 
I should preface this by saying that I am very happy with my primary maker. They have been great and do excellent work.
They always have trial fittings. These fittings help alot once the last is dialed in (indeed I've never had a first fitting where something was not changed) but are less useful when you are adjusting your last or making your first shoe. This is because while the first fitting has a welt and a temporary heel and brace, there is no outsole attached. Things can tighten up quite alot when the uppers are sewn onto the outsoles. This can affect the width of the shoes at the heel or forefoot, and the ankle opening, among other things. Also, things like forefoot flexibility are very difficult to discern when there is no outsole.
I'm currently having a pair made by a different maker that does absolutely no fittings. Depending on who you speak to, this works for them because 1) they do not build as close to the last, or 2) (according to them) they have the best last makers in the world. We'll see.
I know G&G/Cleverley have trial fittings with welted shoe with heels but no outsole. But I think that trial fittings would be different from trial shoes, where cutting up a pair of trial shoes JLP, Delos, or Yohei Fukuda style is more objective diagnosis of fit compare to a trial fitting with subjective feedback.