Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Health & Body › Good, cheap running watch that shows distance
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Good, cheap running watch that shows distance

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
I'm looking for a reliable, cheap running watch.

All I need it to do is tell time, allow me to set some kind of timer, and most importantly display the distance I've covered. I don't know if this has to happen via GPS or if it can happen with some kind of pedometer. I went to EMS today and everything was in the $200 range. Surely this can be had much cheaper. So, I look to you for a recommendation. Something that will reliably tell me the distance.

Please no replies about how I should use Google Maps (I like to explore new routes so don't map beforehand) or my iPhone (I run with an iPod Shuffle)

Thanks.
post #2 of 18
AFAIK Timex has the cheapest GPS watches.
post #3 of 18
Here's a good one for under $150. Much cheaper than that? Good luck. http://www.amazon.com/Garmin-Forerun...dp/B000CSWCQA/
post #4 of 18
Looks fucking huge on the model's wrist.

post #5 of 18
Good, cheap, small -- you can have two.
post #6 of 18
.........
post #7 of 18
Why is measuring distance important? Measuring everything is OCD.
post #8 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg_atlanta View Post
Why is measuring distance important? Measuring everything is OCD.

+1. Go run for 40 minutes. It makes no difference whether you ran 5.2 or 5.4 miles.
post #9 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg_atlanta View Post
Why is measuring distance important? Measuring everything is OCD.

If your training for a race knowing distance could be important.
post #10 of 18
What kind of phone do you have?

I was able to install Nokia Sports Tracker on my phone (works on any S60 nokia) and it tells me distance/speed and can even upload it to a website and overlay it on google maps. Pretty neat--its clearly centered on the euro market as everything defaults to km and all of the users sharing stuff seem to be in europe (also, AT&T hates packaged software that you don't have to pay for so nobody knows their phone can do this).

iphones have motionx gps and I am sure android has something similar.

All of these are completely free (well motionx has a free and a paid version but the free one can still keep track of a single route at a time).
post #11 of 18
^ +1. Adroid phones have My Tracks (http://mytracks.appspot.com/) which is incredibly useful, it keeps pretty much all data that satisfies any level of OCD
IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later.       I AGREE

TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.
post #12 of 18
By a used, older generation, Ipod nano and the Nike Plus system. That will probably run you less than $100.
post #13 of 18
I bought a nike+ wristband and sensor because I wanted something simple to measure my pace at. While I've only had it for a short while but it does exactly what I want, the only issue is that you have to add the sensor to your shoe. This wasn't really an issue as there a lots of little clips that you can buy to do the job. The pricing on the nike+ products is probably on the verge of predatory to keep other manufacturers out. It's really small as well as being very reasonably priced.
post #14 of 18
nike+ is a rip off. It isn't accurate at all. My friend tested his out after calibrating it and it was off by about a mile. If you have an iphone, you should check out the strands app for strands.com, it loads all your info onto a training log and shows you the route and elevation on google maps all for free. For a watch though I would go with the garmin forerunner 305 like someone mentioned above, it is fairly cheap and has everything you need and then some.
post #15 of 18
Regarding the accuracy that airblaster503 mentioned. I hadn't really thought about how accurate the thing was. The guy who sold it told me that it was about 90% accurate. I have just started to get into running so 90% sounded pretty good to me; I was more concerned with learning to control my pace. Tonight I measured out a 8k run with google maps and ran it with the nike+ uncalibrated. Anyway the 8k run measured out at 7.68k with the nike+. That's 96ish% accurate out the box. The thing is I'm not even sure how accurate the google map measurement was. edit to add: redid the route measurement off the nike mapit website. The route distance came out to 7.8km so 98% accuracy by those measurements. Complete accuracy is something that many people desire, and if one is serious about training it's probably needed. I don't think this device would please those people. For me right now it's helping motivating me to run and too keep a more even pace.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Health & Body
Styleforum › Forums › Lifestyle › Health & Body › Good, cheap running watch that shows distance