Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The SF-approved non-baller boot and shoe thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The SF-approved non-baller boot and shoe thread

post #1 of 99
6/20/10 at 10:30am
Thread Starter 
We have a non-baller sneaker thread, I thought we could have a non-baller boot and shoe thread also.



clarks DB

topsiders


weejuns

http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/49464?from=SR&feat=sr
ll bean katahdin

http://cdni.llbean.com/is/image/wim/...id=330&hei=295
ll bean blucher mocs
Reply
Reply
post #2 of 99
6/20/10 at 12:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbie View Post
We have a non-baller sneaker thread, I thought we could have a non-baller boot and shoe thread also.



clarks DB

topsiders


weejuns

http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/49464?from=SR&feat=sr
ll bean katahdin

http://cdni.llbean.com/is/image/wim/...id=330&hei=295
ll bean blucher mocs

or not
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 99
6/20/10 at 12:29pm
Ebay's Vintage Florsheims Bass Bucks
Reply
Reply
post #4 of 99
6/20/10 at 12:30pm



http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=27461


http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=87638
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 99
6/20/10 at 12:56pm
^ The purpose of this thread is to make it easier for people to find non-baller shoes and boots instead of sifting though 100 pages of discussion about shoes and boots which includes both >$300 and <$300 shoes.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:04pm
This is a great idea.
Reply
Reply
post #7 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackTheRipper View Post
^ The purpose of this thread is to make it easier for people to find non-baller shoes and boots instead of sifting though 100 pages of discussion about shoes and boots which includes both >$300 and <$300 shoes.

LOL, where did you come up with the magic $300 number? Maybe we could just have multiple threads for boots and shoes with $20 price point increments so lazy people don't have to search as much.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:19pm
I just used the number from the sneaker threads in which baller is defined as more than $300 ((though it may have been tongue in cheek)). This thread has a purpose and isn't some sort of special flower clutter. Y u hatin?
Reply
Reply
post #9 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:28pm
Because it's redundant and ultimately isn't going to help anyone.
Reply
Reply
post #10 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:32pm
I think a thread about shoes that are affordable isn't redundant at all, and it will help people who are looking for affordable shoes. I also think that you're being insufferable.
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:38pm
llbean katahdins
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 99
6/20/10 at 1:39pm

SeaVees Buck Ivory from context.
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 99
6/20/10 at 3:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackTheRipper View Post
Ebay's Vintage Florsheims

+1 Got some lovely longwings for thirty bucks a few months ago.
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 99
6/20/10 at 3:42pm
Anyone else really dislike the term SF-approved?
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 99
6/20/10 at 3:53pm
Kudos for the thread, Robbie. I endorse the Clarks DBs, Sperry A/O boat shoes, and Bass Bucks options. Weejuns are good too.

Beyond that, a guy shouldn't have a closet full of shoes like the wife of a southeast pacific ocean country's president. It just ain't right.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The SF-approved non-baller boot and shoe thread