Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › There is PRON on the Interwebs?????
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

There is PRON on the Interwebs?????

post #1 of 33
Thread Starter 
But honey, I just use it to look at a mens' style website, honest!

post #2 of 33
That was really enjoyable thanks.
post #3 of 33
number 11 is depressing/sad/pisses me off.

number 13 is about 3 minutes longer than it needs to be.
post #4 of 33
Those that pay for porn have not discovered tubsites/usenet/torrents.
post #5 of 33
Eye opening.
post #6 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblova View Post
Those that pay for porn have not discovered tubsites/usenet/torrents.
Which just goes to show you how much of an underestimate some of these numbers are. If everyone who looked at porn online paid for it, internet porn would likely be the world's biggest industry.
post #7 of 33
Free Porn FTW.
post #8 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mblova View Post
Those that pay for porn have not discovered tubsites/usenet/torrents.

From a strictly academic perspective, lets say someone does not know about tubsites/usenet/torrents, what would you recommend to that person.
post #9 of 33
I wonder why Elmhurst is such a big porno search engine leader. People flying out of O'Hare cozy up in their hotel rooms with porn each night or something?
post #10 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmorel View Post
From a strictly academic perspective, lets say someone does not know about tubsites/usenet/torrents, what would you recommend to that person.

Ed, you don't need any more stimulation.
post #11 of 33
Elmhurst, Illinois...hmmm...
post #12 of 33
Look at Utah. Says something, methinks.
post #13 of 33
Who googles "sex"?
post #14 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jekyll View Post
Who googles "sex"?

See #12
post #15 of 33
Garbage. I call bullshit on most of those items. First, they should define what is "pornography". Simply pictures of naked people is not necessarily pornographic.

#2 is garbage, because there is no way that much money is being spent on porn. That seems to be based off of #4 which is a frequently cited quote with ZERO evidence to back it up. http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/25/0524porn_2.html

#3 is also garbage, because demographic studies of pornography viewers are unscientific and nonsense. The vast majority of internet porn viewers do so anonymously, without revealing much in the way of personal information.

#5 I'm not sure what constitutes a "pornographic email", but again, I highly doubt that number unless it is trying to include pornographic spam, which is sent out to untold numbers of people and is routinely deleted before ever being viewed.

#6 is also garbage, which can be seen by examining #8, which claims "sex" and "adult dating" are pornographic search terms. News flash to asshole prudes trying to make a flashy story, THEY AREN'T. There are perfectly legitimate non-pornographic reasons to search for sex or adult dating that have nothing to do with pornography.

#7 I can't even imagine where someone would try to attempt to figure out a percentage of porn downloads. Do porno pics and films have a secretly embedded tag that indicates it is of a pornographic nature? And who keeps track of this nonsense? BULLSHIT.

#11 Are there really? STFU. No one is plugging CP into google expecting to get a result. It's just not happening, stop lying.

#12 Possible, but why is this surprising or a problem? I saw my first Playboy at like 11 and somehow I've managed not to go out and kill busloads of nuns. This isn't shocking or interesting.

#13 "Admit". So again, the study is based on nonsense studies and online surveys. Go back to college and take a statistics course, stupid.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Entertainment and Culture
Styleforum › Forums › General › Entertainment and Culture › There is PRON on the Interwebs?????