or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The definitive SF-approved non-baller sneaker thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The definitive SF-approved non-baller sneaker thread - Page 8

post #106 of 2671
Regular vs slim:
post #107 of 2671
Anyone have Supras? How does their sizing run? I want some Thunders

post #108 of 2671
I kinda want to see those slim Chucks in person.
post #109 of 2671
The slim Chucks look like something you'd see at Zara.
post #110 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by pebblegrain View Post
Anyone have Supras? How does their sizing run? I want some Thunders

For me they've been true to size. They also don't run narrow.
post #111 of 2671
post #112 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevester1 View Post
For me they've been true to size. They also don't run narrow.

Do you mean true as in same as Nike sneakers? or dress shoe size.
post #113 of 2671
Since this is meant to be a "definitive SF-Approved" thread, can someone go through and edit out the non-approved shoes? Having the bad mixed in with the good can be very confusing for newbies like me who are still trying to develop a good sense of style.
post #114 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by pebblegrain View Post
Do you mean true as in same as Nike sneakers? or dress shoe size.

True to sneakers - Nike, Adidas, etc.
post #115 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by modernrenman View Post
Since this is meant to be a "definitive SF-Approved" thread, can someone go through and edit out the non-approved shoes? Having the bad mixed in with the good can be very confusing for newbies like me who are still trying to develop a good sense of style.

lol
post #116 of 2671
Those 'slim' chucks, just seem like a modern reinterpretation of them... I like them. They sort of look worn in, i mean the profile is like a clean worn in chuck.
post #117 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by modernrenman View Post
Since this is meant to be a "definitive SF-Approved" thread, can someone go through and edit out the non-approved shoes? Having the bad mixed in with the good can be very confusing for newbies like me who are still trying to develop a good sense of style.

Allow me to summarize: chucks, jacks, supergas and keds all with laces no slip on.

/thread
post #118 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbie View Post
Those 'slim' chucks, just seem like a modern reinterpretation of them... I like them. They sort of look worn in, i mean the profile is like a clean worn in chuck.

My girl has a pair of slim chucks, i'm not sure if they come in mens/womens, but hers are really slim. They're slimmer than keds slim, like definitely a feminine shape slim. I say why not just get 1. regular chucks or 2. keds.

I have the muji shoes in white (got them for the summer) and they're pretty good. The shape is really nice, the canvas is sturdy but thin enough to breathe and the sole is really thin but well constructed. They don't have great traction compared to vans authentics (last summer's white canvas shoe for me) though they're still better than the weird plastic/rubber hybrid on chucks these days. Regardless of the price, they have a really good shape and low profile which makes them perfect for, as impolyt said, inconspicuous but attractive canvas sneakers.
post #119 of 2671
i can already feel even small rocks and shit when i walk in chucks, i dunno how comfortable those slims are, their really fucking popular over here right now, mainly with girls. They probably don't crack at the sides of where your toe flexes though which is where my converse always die.
post #120 of 2671
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbie View Post
they are apparently the go-to shoe for members of the French Foreign Legion, which in and of itself is a pull to these shoes IMHO.
Nice legs. Oh and the sneakers aren't bad either.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › The definitive SF-approved non-baller sneaker thread