or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Where RJ At????
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Where RJ At???? - Page 6

post #76 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
I trust RJ's theory about the source, which led me to stop joking about that person.
Oh, good. Pardon me if I say that it's about effing time. /bitter.

Quote:
If the source is who RJ thinks it is
There is really no question about it. Would you like to see my legal bill?

Quote:
I am unimpressed by FNB removing the post from his site since he otherwise provides a home on the Internet for this personality.
+ another ten trillion.
post #77 of 161
Sooo who is it?
post #78 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
I continue to be perplexed by the degree of emotion spilled over such trivial topics like clothes.
Well to be fair, this is not normal behaviour. Just like with everything, there are various degrees of sanity in discussing trivial topics like clothes. Some people spend all of their earnings (or more) on clothes or other hobbies and become clinically obsessed - sometimes to the point of filling their entire mind (or physically, their small 2-bedroom apartment) with the object of their obsessions. We've encountered a handful of clinical cases over the last few years, and with 70,000+ SF members I'd say it would be odd if we had not. That guy is clearly nuts - everyone knows it, even those who throw peanuts to the monkey to keep themselves entertained.
post #79 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
I continue to be perplexed by the degree of emotion spilled over such trivial topics like clothes. It's like a life and death struggle for some people and they do seem to stalk their online enemies with a rather ferocious and psychotic vengefulness.
i think it's slightly different. it's people with an overload of ferocious and psychotic vengefulness searching for life and death struggles ... and you can find anything you're looking for on the internet.
post #80 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdl203 View Post
Well to be fair, this is not normal behaviour. Just like with everything, there are various degrees of sanity in discussing trivial topics like clothes. Some people spend all of their earnings (or more) on clothes or other hobbies and become clinically obsessed - sometimes to the point of filling their entire mind (or physically, their small 2-bedroom apartment) with the object of their obsessions. We've encountered a handful of clinical cases over the last few years, and with 70,000+ SF members I'd say it would be odd if we had not. That guy is clearly nuts - everyone knows it, even those who throw peanuts to the monkey to keep themselves entertained.

Quote:
Originally Posted by foodguy View Post
i think it's slightly different. it's people with an overload of ferocious and psychotic vengefulness searching for life and death struggles ... and you can find anything you're looking for on the internet.

Yeah, you're both right. It's still dismaying, though.


- B
post #81 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
Oh, good. Pardon me if I say that it's about effing time. /bitter.

Cut me some slack. I haven't been in this neck of the woods as long as several of you.


- B
post #82 of 161
While I'm not privy to exactly what happened, it doesn't shock me and it is telling that even FNB thought the material in question was too awful and vicious to keep online.

This much is clear: it's a terrible, tragic turn for the forum to lose a valuable poster like RJman. I've had the pleasure of meeting RJ in person, so I can say that it is also a shame we have lost a genuinely good guy. Not many of us can claim to be the real deal, and RJ is.

RJ, I understand, and good luck. Let's keep in touch offline.
post #83 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
There is really no question about it. Would you like to see my legal bill?

Wow, really? You have a legal bill b/c of that guy? Must have missed something...
post #84 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
Cut me some slack. I haven't been in this neck of the woods as long as several of you.


- B
You've had it explained to you over and over. You've also been able to see quite a bit with your own two eyes. Not all of what you did see was harmless or cute. To say the least.
post #85 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
You've had it explained to you over and over. You've also been able to see quite a bit with your own two eyes. Not all of what you did see was harmless or cute. To say the least.

Minor correction: I believe that I had it explained to me over and over and over again.

There was an extra "over" that you missed.


- B
post #86 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
Minor correction: I believe that I had it explained to me over and over and over again.

There was an extra "over" that you missed.


- B

Glad to see that even you have your red lines.
post #87 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manton View Post
Glad to see that even you have your red lines.

Please: blue lines.


- B
post #88 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
Please: blue lines.


- B

Prussian Blue.
post #89 of 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxsartoria View Post
Please: blue lines.


- B

You can snark all you want, but we both know that you egged on and enjoyed this person's torments until it became embarassingly untenable any longer--and until you were directly called on it by the victim. Your dodge that you weren't around and so didn't know is transparent BS.
post #90 of 161
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Where RJ At????