The difference between lightsky and I are that there is a limit to how much "curve" I find appealing, and proportionate body shape is pretty important to what I find attractive. From the waist up, I have no problem with Kim Kardashian (aside from the fact that she's spoiled and dumb as a rock) Its just the fact that her behind is MUCH bigger than any other part of her body. So freakishly large in fact, that it looks fake. As for all this "supermodels aren't curvy" nonsense... I want to take the scientific approach. These are the women you named that have measurements that you find so appealing "like real women" Salma Hayek 36C-25-37 Julia Roberts 34B-23-34 Jennifer Lopez (in her Selena days) 34?-24-36 Halle Berry 36C-22-37 Scarlett Johansson 36C-23-35 Raquel Welch 37C-22.5-35 Sophia Loren (1955) 38C-24-38 Jane Tierney 34B-24-35: Shania Twain 36-24-34 Selena 34-24-36 Diana Ross (after implants) 34C-25-35 With the exception of Salma, Halle Berry and Sophia Loren, none of these ladies are significantly "curvier" than Laetitia Casta according to their measurements, ESPECIALLY not Julia Roberts. Cindy Crawford 34B-26-35 Laetitia Casta 35C-23-35.5:
Which would lead one to believe that you are either extremely confused, or are just disagreeing with whatever I say just to argue.