Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › America's Largest Single Family Home on the Market for $100 Million
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

America's Largest Single Family Home on the Market for $100 Million - Page 6

post #76 of 80
The high-tech mansion doesn't appeal to me. Personally I prefer the low-tech house that predates the Digital Age ...


...and even the house that predates the Industrial Age ...

post #77 of 80
This is the house a few streets over from me: To put it in perspective it's a perfect square, so its as deep as it is wide. The flower area used to be on the inside but sometime in the 1800's it was knocked down due to the high cost of running the house. Until then it was second biggest house in Britain, with Buckingham palace taking first. The guy who owns it still lives there; he is a member of my flying club and a really nice guy.
post #78 of 80
While I am a big fan of pre-industrial manor homes, I wonder exactly how "livable" they'd be by today's standards. How susceptible to hot and cold are they in certain times of the year, and so forth? Is there adequate room to add some sort of central heating and air conditioning, or is that just not possible? Not that I'll ever be able to afford an ancient castle or stately home, but when entertaining the fantasy, I wonder if I'd miss the creature comforts of modernity while living there.
post #79 of 80
I'd say that temperature would be fairly ok, apart from the fact that you could probably add Air conditioning, they often had under-floor heating in the form of pipes. Also one of your many butlers would be able to employ a maid to keep fires burning in each room. Keeping cool shouldn't be a problem; nothing like 4ft of stone to stay cool even in summer. The guy who owns the house I posted has plug sockets and internet connections in every room so it can't be too tough. I guess you could almost make an inner-shell for each room in a more modern style. The cavity between the real walls and your new ones would allow for heating/lighting/electricity to be put in without damaging any masonry.
post #80 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by SField View Post
Recreating a palace like Versailles or Innsbrook would be incredibly difficult, and almost quite literally impossible.

The basic structure of these palaces would themselves be so incredibly expensive given that their scale often dwarfs that of even the biggest homes today. Enormous ceilings, beams of solid oak, walls a meter thick... then consider that there remain maybe a handful of artisans in the world who can do what many more could do in the time that the palaces were built. Just the time that it would take to build would make it prohibitive since you wouldn't have enough skilled people working to do it. Most the people alive today who can do that are involved primarily in restoration, and they command a massive price tag.

Giant columns of marble, acres of gold leaf... it just isn't possible. But it was explained to me that the ornaments wouldn't even be the real problem, nor even would be the artisanship (masonry, painting, marble sculpture, highly specialized carpentry), it would be the building techniques. These palaces last forever for a reason... they're built like absolute tanks.

actually with modern techniques and building tech, recreation may ot be possible to to create somting just a strong and long lasting is not problem. on the outside the place woudl appear to be a replica but it would not be.
structurally these types of mansion and palaces are not complex. the omplexity comes witht he interior work.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › America's Largest Single Family Home on the Market for $100 Million